期刊文献+

肝移植术后环孢素治疗药物监测 被引量:5

Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine in patients with liver transplantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究肝移植受者环孢素A临床药动学特点,优化环孢素A治疗药物监测方案。方法:采用荧光偏振免疫法测定环孢素A血药浓度,计算临床药动学参数。建立AUC0-12h与浓度变量回归模型。对C0、C2常规监测数据进行分析。结果:环孢素代谢呈二房室开放模型。C0+C2与AUC0-12h相关较为强烈,C2与AUC0-4h和AUC0-12h的相关性高于C0。在估算AUC0→12h的回归模型中,C0+C2最好,SE和R-sq分别为501.0和94.7,其后是C6,C2,C9,C4和C0。结论:环孢素A临床药动学个体差异大。C0+C2两点监测是环孢素A最好的监测方法,可客观评价环孢素A体内药物暴露(AUC0-12h),减少急性排斥和药物中毒发生。C2/C0可以作为评价移植肝功能恢复的灵敏指标。 OBJECTIVE To study clinical phmanacokinetics of cyclosporine A in liver transplant recipients and optimize cyclosporine A therapeutic drug monitoring strategy. METHODS The whole blood concentrations of cyclosporine A were measured by fluorescence polarization itrununoassay (FPIA) , clinical pharmacokinetics parameters of cyclosporine A were computed. While blood cyclosporine A concentrations being independent variable, AUC0-12h, regression models were established. Routine monitoring data of C0 and C2 were analysed. RESULTS Cyclosporine A metabolizability were a linear two-compartment model with first-order absorption. There was strong correlation between C0 +C2 and AUC0-12h, and the correlation between C2 and AUC0 -4h or AUC0-12h was both more excellent than C0. In regression models for calculating AUC0-12h, C0 + C2 single complex variable was the best, SE and R - sq were 501.02 and 94.7, respectively. Next was C6, C2, C9, C4, C0. CONCLUSION Clinical pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A was greatly different among patients. C0 + C2 of two point monitoring was the best monitoring method for cyclosporine A . It can evaluate impersonally cydosporine exposure (AUC0-12h) in body and decrease rejection and drug toxicity. C2/C0 was a sensitive indication to.evaluate function restoriation of the transplant liver.
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期40-42,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
关键词 肝移植 环孢素A 治疗 药物监测 药动学 liver transplantation cyclosporine A therapeutic drug monitoring pharmacokinetics
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献11

  • 1Johnston A, David OJ, Cooney GF. Pharmacokinetic validation of Neoral absorption profiling. Transplant Proc, 2000, 32(Suppl 3A):53-56.
  • 2Belitsky P, Levy GA, Johnston A. Neoral absorption profiling: an evolution in effectiveness. Transplant Proc, 2000, 32(Suppl 3A):45-52.
  • 3Mahalati K, Belitsky P, Sketris I, et al. Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve.Transplantation, 1999, 68: 55-62.
  • 4Belitsky P. Neoral use in the renal transplant recipient. Transplant Proc, 2000, 32(Suppl 3A) : 10-19.
  • 5Cantarovich M , Besner JG , Barkun JS , et al . Two - hour cyclosporine level determination is the appropriate tool to monitor Neoral therapy. Clin Transplant, 1998, 12:243-249.
  • 6Lindholm A, Kahan BD. Influence of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics, trough concentrations, and AUC monitoring on outcome after kidney transplantation[J]. Clin pharmacol Ther, 1993,55;205.
  • 7Mahalati K, Belitsky P, Sketris I, et al. Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration - time curve[J]. Translantation, 1999,68; 55.
  • 8Johnston A, David OJ, Cooney GF. Pharmacokinetic validation of Neoral absorption profiling[J]. Transplant Proc, 2000, 32(3): 53.
  • 9Bjom N, Edward C, Gary L, et al. Clinical validation studies of Neoral C2 monitoring: a review[J]. Transplantation, 2002,73(9): 3.
  • 10Halloran PF, Helms LM, Kung L, et al. The temporal profile of calcineurin inhibition by cyclosporine in vivo [J ]. Transplantation, 1999, 68:1356.

共引文献27

同被引文献79

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部