摘要
在违约责任中,损害赔偿为合同救济制度的中心,这一制度是保证当事人全面准确履行合同义务的重要措施。但是对违约损害赔偿的一般原则、归责原则、构成要件以及是否应对非财产损害(精神损害)进行赔偿的问题一直有争议,在新的合同法施行后该问题仍然存在。应当明确违约损害赔偿的一般原则在于损害的填补,不允许惩罚性赔偿;归责原则应当同违约责任的归责原则一致;在构成要件上,并不需要考虑因果关系;对非财产损害(精神损害)明确给予赔偿。
As the heart of the contract remedy, damages are an important measure in the liabilities for breach of contract to ensure the full performance of both parties. But the general principle of damages, the doctrine of liability, the important constructive conditions and moral damages are still in dispute even after the new Contract Law has taken effect. The analysis of the new law shows that remedy shall be the general principle of damages and the punitive damages shall not be allowed. The doctrine of damages shall accord with that of liability and causality is not a necessary constructive condition. Moral damages should be employed.
出处
《南京工程学院学报（社会科学版）》
2005年第3期5-10,共6页
Journal of Nanjing Institute of Technology：Social Science Edition
关键词
违约责任
损害赔偿
归责原则
精神损害赔偿
liabilities for breach of contract
damages
doctrine of liability
moral damages
