期刊文献+

中国股市截面收益率再研究:分位数回归方法 被引量:14

A New Perspective on the Cross-sectional Return in China' s Stock Market: Quantile Regression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分位数回归方法因为考虑了分布函数的各局部信息而比只考虑条件期望的普通最小二乘回归方法更具有优势,特别是在具有厚尾分布的金融数据分析方面,提供了更详尽的信息。本文通过分位数回归方法重新审视中国股市截面收益率的共同风险因子,查看是否存在规模效应与帐面市值比效应。结果发现,分位数回归结果与普通最小二乘结果显著不同,不同分位数下回归系数及其统计显著性都存在巨大差异。股票收益率与规模正相关的规模效应显著,且高收益率部分的正规模效应更加强烈。帐面市值比效应在低收益率部分正相关,高收益率阶段负相关,中间部分不显著。 OLS (Ordinary Least Square) regression merely reports the conditional expectation. However, QR (Quantile Regression) makes use of local information of the entire distribution, thus is superior in most applications, especially for fattailed financial data. In this paper, by utilizing beth OLS and QR, we investigate systematic risk factors, such as market betas, size and book-to market ratio, for cross-sectional returns in China's stock market. As expected, the QR method tells more stories. There is a positive size effect, which becomes stronger for higher quantiles. With respect to book-to-market effect, we find positive effect in lower quantile, yet negative effect in higher quantiles.
出处 《南方经济》 北大核心 2006年第1期61-71,共11页 South China Journal of Economics
关键词 资产定价 分位数回归 规模效应 帐面市值比效应 Asset pricing Quantile regression Size effect Book-to-Market effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1汪炜,周宇.中国股市“规模效应”和“时间效应”的实证分析——以上海股票市场为例[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):16-21. 被引量:94
  • 2张祥建,谷伟,郭岚.上海股票市场“规模效应”的实证研究及原因探析[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2003,24(4):24-28. 被引量:10
  • 3朱世武,郑淳.中国资本市场股权风险溢价研究[J].世界经济,2003,26(11):62-70. 被引量:44
  • 4Bassett, Gilbert W., Mo-Yin S. Tam, and Keith Knight, 2002, "Quantile models and estimators for data analysis," Metrika, 55, 17-27.
  • 5Berk, J. B., 1995, "A critique of size-related anomalies," Review of Financial Studies, 8, 275-286.
  • 6Chan, L. K. C., J. Karceski and J. Lakonishok, 2000, "New paradigm or same old hype in equity investing," Financial Analysts Journal,July/August, 23-36.
  • 7Fama, Eugene F, 1996, "Multifactor Portfolio Efficiency and Multifactor Asset Pricing,"Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31:4, 441-65.
  • 8Fama, Eugene F. and J. D. MacBeth, 1973, "Risk, return and equilibrium: Empirical tests," Journal of Political Economy, 81, 607-636.
  • 9Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French, 1992, "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, 47:2, 427-65.
  • 10Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French., 1993, "Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, 33:1, 3-56.

二级参考文献18

  • 1李瑾.我国证券市场的交易成本与市场效率[J].农村金融研究,2002,0(7):17-19. 被引量:1
  • 2宋颂兴,金伟根.上海股市市场有效实证研究[J].经济学家,1995(4):107-113. 被引量:161
  • 3吴世农.我国证券市场效率的分析[J].经济研究,1996,31(4):13-19. 被引量:318
  • 4[1]BARBER B M,LYON J D.Firm Size,Book-to-market Ratio,and Security Returns:A Holdout Sample of Financial Firms[J].Journal of Finance,1997,(52):875-883.
  • 5[2]BANZ R W.The Relationship between return and market value of common stocks[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1981,(9):3-18.
  • 6[3]KEIM D B.Size-related anomalies and stock return seasonality[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1983,(12):13-32.
  • 7[4]LAKONISHOK J,ANDREI S,ROBERT W V.Contrarian investment,extrapolation,and risk[J].Journal of Finance,1994,(49):1541-1578.
  • 8[5]FAMA E F,FRENCH K R.The cross-section of expected stock returns[J].Journal of Finance,1992,(47):427-465.
  • 9[6]FAMA E F,FRENCH K R.Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds[J].Journal of Financial economics,1993,(33):3-56.
  • 10[7]FAMA E F,FRENCH K R.Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies[J].Journal of Finance,1996,51:55-84.

共引文献140

同被引文献153

引证文献14

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部