期刊文献+

心理解剖在中国自杀研究中应用的可行性 被引量:16

The Applicability of Psychological Autopsy for Suicide Research in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过对访谈工具的评价,对心理解剖方法进行信度和效度分析,探讨心理解剖方法在中国大陆的可行性。方法:选取自杀死亡者66例和正常对照组66例,每例访谈两个信息人同时访谈正常对照组本人,共计访谈330人。结果:从分半信度和α系数结果(r〉0.6)看,各工具量表具有较高的内在一致性;从评分者信度结果看,总体上各工具量表具有较高的信度(r〉0.6);以正常对照组本人作为“金标准”,信息人与本人具有较高的一致性,既具有较高的效度(r=0.21—0.61)。结论:由信息人所提供的信息具有可信性和有效性,在中国大陆自杀研究中采用心理解剖方法具有可行性。 Objective: The purpose of this study is to probe the applicability of the psychological autopsy in Chinese mainland by the reliability and validity of the instruments. Methods: Sampling 66 completed suicides and 66 matched normal controls, two informants were interviewed for each case including controls themselves. The total number of interviews is 330. Results: Almost all the instruments had good inter- rater reliability ( r 〉 0. 6 ) . And there was high internal consistency in major instruments. The validity was examined by comparing the responses of informants and responses ( good standards) of the target person in normal control group. There was also a high validity ( r =0. 21 -0. 61 ) . Conclusion: The information reconstructed from the informants has good reliability and validity. It is possible to study suicide with psychological autopsy in China.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期19-22,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 本课题得到NIMH资助(R03MH60828-01A1)
关键词 自杀 心理解剖 病例对照研究 信度 效度 suicide psychological autopsy case-control study reliability validity China
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Beskow J, Runeson B, Asgard U. Psychological autopsies:Methods and ethics. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 1990, 20(4) : 307-323.
  • 2Shneidman ES. The psychological autopsy. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 1981, 11 (4): 325-340.
  • 3Brent DA. The psychological autopsy: Methodological considerations for the study of adolescent suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behavior, 1989, 19 (1): 43-57.
  • 4Beck AT, Schuyler D, Herman I. Development of suicide intent scales. In: AT Beck, HCP Resnick, D Lettieri . Eds.The prediction of suicide. Bowie, MD: Charles Press, 1974,45-46.
  • 5Landerman R, George LK, Campbell RT, et al. Alternative models of the stress buffering hypothesis. Am J Community Psycho, 1989, 17: 625-642.
  • 6Paykel ES, Prusoff BA, Uhlenhuth EH. Scaling of life events.Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1971, 25 (4) : 340-347.
  • 7Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbonn M, et al. Instruction Manual for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-Ⅲ-R(SCID, 6/1/88 Revision) . Biometrics Research, 1988.
  • 8Hamilton MA. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurgery Psychiatry, 1960, 23: 56-62.
  • 9McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychologist, 1997, 52 (5) : 509-516.
  • 10颜文伟.检验一致性的统计方法[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1986,19(6):367-371.

共引文献11

同被引文献165

引证文献16

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部