期刊文献+

现代性逻辑预设何以生成 被引量:44

Formation of the Logic Presupposition about Modernity
原文传递
导出
摘要 The logic presupposition about modernity is the fundamental narrative of modernity. It defines the most typical characteristics of the key values of modernity, and connects discourses with the specific features of modernity in philosophy and various integrated fields of study. Its formation and development constitute a long historical process. People can get to know modernity at different level of consciousness, such as intuition, senses or feelings, etc. However, only the reflection on modernity by thinking and categorization can give expression to an ever growing sense of historical relativism. Therefore, logic presupposition about modernity is also the theme for philosophical reflection on homogenization of meanings. By the restoration of historical time and space, logic presupposition orders and classifies a variety of specific modes of human practice according to the abstract categories of philosophy. It captures the dialectic essence of historical formation and the development of modernity, and in the meantime provides the exposure of the actual status and the limitations of the evolution of human existence deeply. The logic presupposition about modernity is the fundamental narrative of modernity. It defines the most typical characteristics of the key values of modernity, and connects discourses with the specific features of modernity in philosophy and various integrated fields of study. Its formation and development constitute a long historical process. People can get to know modernity at different level of consciousness, such as intuition, senses or feelings, etc. However, only the reflection on modernity by thinking and categorization can give expression to an ever growing sense of historical relativism. Therefore, logic presupposition about modernity is also the theme for philosophical reflection on homogenization of meanings. By the restoration of historical time and space, logic presupposition orders and classifies a variety of specific modes of human practice according to the abstract categories of philosophy. It captures the dialectic essence of historical formation and the development of modernity, and in the meantime provides the exposure of the actual status and the limitations of the evolution of human existence deeply.
作者 张雄
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期26-36,共11页 Philosophical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1阿尔布劳.2001年:《全球时代—超越现代性之外的国家和社会》.高湘泽.商务印书馆.
  • 2鲍尔格曼 孟庆时.《跨越后现代的分界线》[M].商务印书馆,2003年版.第32-57页.
  • 3鲍曼 邵迎生译.《现代性与矛盾性》[M].商务印书馆,2003年.15页.
  • 4鲍曼.《后现代伦理学》[M].江苏人民出版社,2003年版.第84、82页.
  • 5上海社科院哲学所外国哲学室编.《法兰克福学派论著选辑》.1998年.商务印书馆.
  • 6弗里斯比,2003年:《现代性的碎片》.卢晖临,周怡,李林艳.商务印书馆.
  • 7福山 黄胜强 许铭原 译.《历史的终结及最后之人》[M].中国社会科学出版社,2003..
  • 8哈耶克.《个人主义与经济秩序》[M].北京经济学院出版社,1989..
  • 9.《海德格尔选集》[M].生活·读书·新知·三联书店,1996年版.第1276、1271、265、269、229、283、275页.
  • 10赫勒 阿格尼丝 李瑞华 译.《现代性理论》[M].商务印书馆,2005年..

共引文献316

同被引文献309

引证文献44

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部