期刊文献+

中国经济学界需要什么样的多元论 被引量:4

WHAT KIND OF PLURALISM DOES CHINESE ECONOMICS COMMUNITY NEED
下载PDF
导出
摘要 经济学多元论具有多层次的含义,绝不能把它简单地看成是方法的多元论。今天,多元论问题已经构成经济学改革国际运动中极为重要的内容,日益引起学者们的高度关注。应该站在对西方主流经济学的反思高度,站在对中国经济学未来发展趋势的前瞻高度,从广义方法论上讨论多元论问题。中国经济学界所需要的是广义方法论上的多元论,这对我们在马克思主义的指导下推动中国经济学的繁荣具有重要的理论意义。 Economic pluralism has multiple meanings and cannot be simply regarded as pluralism in methodology. Today, the issue on pluralism has become a crucial content of international movement of economics reform and increasingly gotten a high note from the scholars. We thus should address the plural ism issue on an altitude of reviewing the mainstream economics of the West and an altitude of forecasting the future of China's economics, for the pluralism that Chinese economic community need is a generalized pluralism, which has an important theory meaning for us to help the Chinese economics thriving and prosperous under the guidance of Marxism.
出处 《经济理论与经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期24-29,共6页 Economic Theory and Business Management
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(05BJL044) 教育部人文社会科学基金博士点项目(03JB790035)
关键词 经济学广义方法论 方法 方法论 generalized methodology of economics method methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1马克·布劳格.超越实证主义[A].罗杰·E·巴克豪斯.经济学方法论的新趋势[C].北京:经济科学出版社, 2000..
  • 2S. C. Dow. The Methodology of Maeroeconomic Thought [M]. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK? Northampton, MA, USA, 1996.
  • 3富布鲁克.经济学的危机[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.
  • 4马克·布劳格.经济学方法论[M].商务印书馆,1992..
  • 5贾根良.批判实在论:经济学方法论的新发展[J].自然辩证法通讯,2004,26(2):31-35. 被引量:10
  • 6P. Arestis. Post-Keynesian Eonomics: Towards Coherence [J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1996, 20 (1):114-115.
  • 7Andrew Brown. Critical Realism [A]. J. E. King. The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics[C]. Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA, USA, 2003.
  • 8杰弗里·M·霍奇逊.制度与演化经济学现代文选:关键性概念[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005..
  • 9Lawson. Reorienting Economics [M]. London and New York, Routledge, 2003.
  • 10T. Lawson. Why Are So Many Economists Opposed to Methodology? [J]. Journal of Economic Methodology, 1994, (1): 105-134.

二级参考文献17

  • 1马克思.《资本论》(第1卷)[M].人民出版社,1972年.第127页.
  • 2《龚六堂副教授在线访谈实录》[J].中国经济学教育科研网刊,2003,(3).
  • 3Fleetwood, S. ed., Critical Realism in Economics : Development and Debate, Routledge, 1999.
  • 4Nielsen, P., Reflections on Critical Realism in Political economy, Cambridge ofEconomics, 2002,26, pp.727-738.
  • 5O'hara, P. A., Marx, Veblen, and Contemporary Institutional Political Economy, Edward Elgar, 2000.
  • 6Dugger, W. M. and Sherman, H.J., Reclaiming Evolution: A Dialogue between Marxism and Institutionalism on Social Change, Routledge, 2000.
  • 7贾根良.《中国经济学发展的西方主流化遭遇重大质疑》.《南开经济研究》2003年第2期.该文发表后[EB/OL].post-autistic economic movment网站(http://www.paecon.net)为此设立''''Chinese Section'''',并与载有该文的《经济学家网站》(http://www.jjxj.,.
  • 8Hodgson, G. M., Evolution and Institution: On Evolutionary Economics and The Evolution of Economics, Edward Elgar, 1999, p.2.
  • 9Fleetwood, S., "Boyland and O' Gorman's Causal Holism: A Critical Realist Evaluation", Cambr/dge Journal of Economics,2002,26, PP. 27 - 45.
  • 10Lawson, T., Econom/cs and Reality, Routledge, 1997.

共引文献47

同被引文献110

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部