期刊文献+

依巴斯汀抗组胺活性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究 被引量:10

A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study of the antihistamine activity of ebastine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究单次口服依巴斯汀10mg的药效动力学特点。方法:60名健康受试者随机、双盲口服依巴斯汀10mg或安慰剂1片,于服药前和服药后2、4、24h,对全部受试者行组胺皮肤点刺滴定试验。在揭盲后,对依巴斯汀组的受试者于服药后48h再做一次组胺皮肤点刺滴定试验。以剂量-反应曲线下面积(AUDRC)和痒觉积分为参数,评价依巴斯汀的抗组胺活性。结果:服药前两组数据无统计学差异。依巴斯汀组的风团和红晕AUDRC于服药后2h即明显低于安慰剂组,而痒觉积分于服药后4h才明显低于安慰剂组(P<0.01)。服用依巴斯汀后24h,AUDRC和痒觉积分均降至最低;48h上述两者均有所升高,但仍明显低于服药前(P<0.01)。结论:依巴斯汀的抗组胺作用起效较慢,作用较强,持续时间较长。 Objective: To evaluate the pharmacodynamic characteristics of single dose of ebastine 10 mg. Methods: Ebastine 10 mg or 1 tablet of placebo was given to 60 healthy volunteers in randomized, double-blind manner. Histamine titration tests were performed for each volunteer before dosing and 2, 4, and 24 hours after dosing. Then opened the blind, the titration tests were performed for ebastine group 48 hours after dosing. The antihistamine activity of ebastine was evaluated by the area under dose-response curve (AUDRC) and itch score. Results: The data of two groups was comparable before dosing. The significant differences of AUDRC between ebastine and placebo group were observed 2, 4 and 24 hours after dosing, but the differences of itch score were observed 4 and 24 hours after dosing (P 〈 0.01). The AUDRC and itch score reached the lowest level 24 hours after dosing ebastine. At 48 hours, both of them were increased, but were still significantly different with those before dosing (P〈 0.01). Conclusion: The present results show that ebastine has a slow onset of therapeutic effect, but potent and long-acting.
机构地区 中国医学科学院
出处 《临床皮肤科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第2期116-117,共2页 Journal of Clinical Dermatology
关键词 依巴斯汀 抗组胺活性 组胺点刺试验 ebastine antihistamine histamine test
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1王瑞琦,张宏誉.组胺点刺皮肤试验的剂量—反应曲线下面积比较抗组胺药物的活性[J].中国医学科学院学报,2004,26(6):634-638. 被引量:8
  • 2Roberts DJ. A preclinical overview of ebastine. Studies on the pharmacological properties of a novel histamine H1 receptor antagonist[J]. Drugs, 1996, 52 (Suppl 1): 8-14.
  • 3Grant JA, Riethuisen JM, Moulaert B, et al. A double-blind,randomized, single-dose, crossover comparison of levocetirizine with ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, mizolastine, and placebo:suppression of histamine-induced wheal-and-flare response during 24 hours in healthy male subjects [J]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2002, 88(2): 190-197.
  • 4Barbanoj MJ, Antonijoan RM, Garcia-Gea C, et al. A study comparing the inhibitory effects of single and repeated oral doses of ebastine and fexofenadine against histamine-induced skin reactivity[J]. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 2003, 132(3): 263-267.
  • 5Bousquet J, gaudano EM, Palma Carlos AG, et al. A 12-week,placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of ebastine, 10 and 20 mg once daily, in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. Multicentre Study Group[J]. Allergy, 1999, 54(6): 562-568.
  • 6支玉香,张宏誉,岳凤敏,李宏,孙劲旅,顾建青,王瑞琦,毕志刚.依巴斯汀治疗慢性特发性荨麻疹的临床试验研究[J].临床皮肤科杂志,2004,33(5):307-309. 被引量:14

二级参考文献16

  • 1Ramboer I, Bumtbacea R, Lazarescu D, et al. Cetirizine and loratadine: a comparison using the ED50 in skin reaction. J Int Med Res, 2000, 28(2):69-77
  • 2Sub-committee on Skin Tests of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Skin tests used in type I allergy testing position paper. Allergy, 1989, 44(Suppl10): 1-59
  • 3Deschamps C, Dubruc C, Mentre F, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of mizolastine in healthy volunteers with an indirect response model. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2000, 68(6):647-657
  • 4Grant JA, Riethuisen JM, Moulaert B, et al. A double-blind,randomized, single-dose, crossover comparison of levocetirizine with ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, mizolastine, and placebo: suppression of histamine-induced wheal-and-flare response during
  • 5Frossard N, Benabdesselam O, Purohit A, et al. Activity of ebastine (10 and 20 mg) and cetirizine at 24 hours of a steady state treatment in the skin of healthy volunteers.Fundam Clin Pharmacol, 2000, 14(4):409-413
  • 6Rosenzweig P, Caplain H, Chaufour S, et al. Comparative wheal and flare study of mizolastine vs terfenadine, cetirizine, loratadine and placebo in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1995, 40(5):459-465
  • 7Simon FE. Mizolastine: antihistaminic activity from preclinical data to clinical evaluation. Clin Exp Allergy, 1999, 29(Suppl1):3-8
  • 8Clissold SP, Sorkin EM, Goa KL. Loratadine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs, 1989, 37(1):42-57
  • 9Bousquet J, Czarlewski W, Cougnard J, et al. Changes in skin-test reactivity do not correlate with clinical efficacy of H1-blockers in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergy, 1998, 53(6):579-585
  • 10Purohit A, Melac M, Pauli G, et al. Comparative activity of cetirizine and mizolastine on histamine-induced skin wheal and flare responses at 24 h. Br J Clin Pharmacol,2002, 53(3):250-254

共引文献20

同被引文献100

引证文献10

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部