期刊文献+

进入权理论:能否成为公司治理的理论基础 被引量:17

Access:Would It Be the Academic Foundation for Corporate Governance
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文认为,进入权理论为公司治理研究提供了一个新的视角,它使得我们对公司治理的理解更贴近于管理实践,但是,进入权自身的机会性使得进入权的配置机制中充满不确定,以至于它无法像设计的那样有效塑造当事人事后的讨价还价能力。不确定来自于:①关键资源的特征。关键资源应该是一束可分割的权利集,即使是一束虚拟的权利集;②对人力资本专用性投资的计量,包括对人力资本专用性投资程度的计量和对人力资本专用性投资绩效的计量。如果不能克服进入权的机会性所引致的不确定,它很可能只是一种可用于指导公司治理实践的思维方式,而不能成为公司治理的理论基础,至少现阶段如此。 Although access has provides a brand-new view on corporate governance approach that it enables us to understand corporate governance practically,access would not shape parties' bargaining power efficiently as it had been expected for opportunities contained in access itself make access allocating mechanism inefficient with begetting uncertainty in. Uncertainty arising from two way: first,the property characteristics in critical resources. Critical resources should be segmentable droit collective,even virtual. Second,the process measuring agent's specific investment with her human capital,including the degree on specific investment and investment performance measuring. On condition that principal could not hurdle uncertainty brought by opportunities,access could probably be seemed as an idea to guide corporate governance practice instead of being taken as theoretical foundation,at least this time.
作者 廖飞 茅宁
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期91-97,共7页 China Industrial Economics
关键词 进入权 关键资源 公司治理 专用性投资 人力资本 access critical resource corporate governance specific investment human capital
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Alchian,A. A.,Demsetz. H. Production,Information Costs,and Economics Organization [J]. American Economic Review, 1972, (62).
  • 2Feldman,Martha S.,March,James G. Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, (26).
  • 3Luigi Zingales. Corporate Governance[R]. NBER Working Paper 6309,1997.
  • 4Philippe Aghion,Jean Tirole. Formal and Real Authority in Organizations[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997, (105).
  • 5Philippe Aghion,Dewatripont Mathias,Rey Patrick. Transferable Control [J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2004, (21).
  • 6Raghuram G. Rajan,Luigi Zingales. Power in a Theory of the Firm [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, (113).
  • 7Raghuram G. Rajan,Luigi Zingales. The Governance of the New Enterprise[R]. NBER Working Paper 7958,2000.
  • 8Raghuram G, Rajan,Luigi Zingales. The Firm as a Dedicated Hierarchy:A Theory of the Origins and Growth of Firms[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2001, (116).
  • 9陈永霞,贾良定,张君君.所有权与进入权分离——国企改制的性质与效率分析[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学),2005,42(2):80-87. 被引量:3
  • 10聂辉华.企业:一种人力资本使用权交易的粘性组织[J].经济研究,2003,38(8):64-69. 被引量:81

二级参考文献55

  • 1张鹏,张梅青.对国企改制若干问题的考察分析和建议——某国企改制的个案分析[J].甘肃社会科学,2004(4):110-113. 被引量:3
  • 2周其仁.市场里的企业:一个人力资本与非人力资本的特别合约[J].经济研究,1996,31(6):71-79. 被引量:2175
  • 3艾尔弗雷德·钱德勒.看得见的手:美国企业的管理革命[M].北京:商务印书馆,1987..
  • 4Cheung, Steven, 1983, "The Contractual Nature of the Firm", Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 1-21.
  • 5Coase, Ronald, 1937, "The Nature of the Firm", Economlca, 4:386-405.
  • 6Foss, Nicolai J, 1999, "The Theory of the Firm: An Introduction to Themes and Contributions", Theories of the Firm : Critical Perspectives in Economic Organization, London: Routledge.
  • 7Grossman, Sanford, and Oliver Hart, 1986, "The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration", Journal of Political Economy, 94:691-719.
  • 8Hart, Oliver, 1995, Firm, Contract and Financial Structure, Oxford Univ. Press.
  • 9Rajan, Raghuram G, and Luigi Zingales, 1998, "Power in a Theory of the Firm", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2: 387-432.
  • 10Rajan, Raghuram G, and Luigi Zingales, 2000, "The Governance of the New Enterprise", NBER Working paper.

共引文献82

同被引文献204

引证文献17

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部