摘要
目的:本研究旨在将帕多瓦量表(PaduaInventory,PI)引进中国,考察PI在中国非临床样本中的因素结构,并检验PI的总分和各因素分的性别差异。方法:样本一为1300个大学生的数据(男680人,女542人,性别缺失78人,平均年龄19.6±2.2岁),样本二为30名大学生在初测4周后进行了重测。结果:探索性因素分析获得PI的4个因素:思维失控与怀疑感、受驱使与行为失控感、污染和检查。信度检验:PI总分的α系数为0.96,四个因素α系数分别为0.94,0.85,0.86,0.83,重测信度分别为0.77,0.87,0.85,0.84。女性被试在因素3的得分显著高于男性(P=.000);男性被试在因素4的得分显著高于女性(P=0.017)。结论:PI具备合格的信度,需进一步研究其效度。
Objective： To develop the Padua Inventory（H） for the use of Chinese college students; explore the structure and examine the sex difference in non-clinical sample in China. Methods： The PI was filled by 1300 college subjects, including 680 males and 542 females （78 gender missing）, aged 19.6±2.2, for exploratory factor analysis （EFA）. The second sample has 30 college students from Peking University for test-retest study. Results： The results of EFA has four factors： impaired control over mental activities/doubting, worries of losing control over motor activities, contamination, and checking. Reliabilities of four factors are 0.94,0.85,0.86,0.83 for each and 0.96 for the total scores. The test-retest correlations of the four factors are 0.77,0.87,0.85,0.84 for each. Females scored significantly higher in factor 3 （P=.000） while males scoring significantly higher in factor 4 （P=.017）. Conclusion： The results suggest that PI has eligible psychometric reliability, but needs further study for the validity in China.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSCD
2006年第1期1-4,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
