摘要
本文运用系统功能语法的三个元功能理论和语言评价理论,对比分析了法定“自首”和一起强奸杀人案中所谓的“自首”。分析发现,案中“自首”不完全符合法定“自首”的要件,因此不是真正法律意义上的自首。本文指出,在司法领域里运用语言学分析可以进一步保证司法的公平性和公正性。
This paper constitutes an attempt to analyze an individual case whose verdict concerns voluntary surrender within a framework that involves the three meta-functions in Halliday's systemic functional grammar and its APPRAISAL systems. The analysis yields the finding that the data analyzed regarding the criminal's voluntary surrender is not in line with the necessary elements of the concept of voluntary surrender stipulated by the national Criminal Law. The paper concludes with a call for judicial professionals to turn to linguistic analysis when it is necessary so that more justice is served.
出处
《现代外语》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第1期1-9,共9页
Modern Foreign Languages
基金
国家博士后基金资助
