期刊文献+

时间限制对EFL作文成绩的影响 被引量:28

Investigating the effects of time restraint on EFL writing,
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究采用开放式问卷、周记、作文测试等定量与定性调查方法,探究了时间限制对EFL作文成绩的影响。定量调查结果表明,实验组与对照组的非限时作文成绩有显著性差异,而30分钟完成的限时作文成绩的差异却不显著。这一调查结果说明,时间限制对不同写作水平的被试可能产生不同程度的影响。定量研究不仅验证了这一调查结果,还进一步显示出时间限制对语言水平较高习作者的写作过程有以下负面影响:降低写作标准、采用被动应对的写作策略、产生消极的写作体验。鉴于此,作者强调了非限时作文练习的重要性,并根据相关调查结果提出了理想的“45分钟”作文测试时间。 An increasing amount of research has been undertaken on the design of EFL writing tasks. This study examines the effects of time restraint on students' writing performance. A variety of research instruments are employed, such as an open-ended questionnaire, weekly journals, writing tests. The exploratory longitudinal study reveals that the subjects in the experimental group performed significantly better in the untimed writing task than the control group, yet with regard to timed writing assignments, no significant difference exists between the groups. The horizontal study and case study further confirm that time restraint exerts greater negative effects on successful EFL learners than on unsuccessful ones. Based on the relevant research findings, the importance of untimed writing assignments is stressed, and the best length of the writing test (i.e. 45 minutes) is recommended.
作者 吴红云
机构地区 中国人民大学
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期37-43,共7页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Benson, P. 1996. Concepts of autonomy in language learning [A]. In R. Pemberton, E. S. L. Or, & H. D. Pierson (eds,). Taking Control : Autonomy in Language Learning [C]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  • 2Broady, E. & M, Kenning (eds,). 1996. Promoting Learner Autonomy in University Language Teaching [C]. London: Association for French Language Studies/CLLT.
  • 3Green, A. 1998. Verbal Protocol Analysis in Language Testing Research: A Handbook [M], Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Hartman, H. J, (ed.). 2001. Metacognition in Learning and Instruction [C]. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • 5Kenning, M. 1996. IT and autonomy [A]. In E, Broady & M. Kenning (eds.). Promoting Learrier Autonomy in University Language Teaching [ C]. London: Association for French Language Studies/ CLLT.
  • 6Pemberton, R., E. S. L. Or & H. D. Pierson. (eds.). 1996. Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning [C]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  • 7Reichelt, M. 1999. Toward a more comprehensive view of L2 writing: Foreign language writing in the U. S. [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 8/2: 181-204.
  • 8Weigle, S.C. 2002. Assessing Writing [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9蔡基刚.大学英语四、六级写作要求和评分标准对中国学生写作的影响[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2002,25(5):49-53. 被引量:134
  • 10蔡兰珍.“任务教学法”在大学英语写作中的应用[J].外语界,2001(4):41-46. 被引量:243

二级参考文献24

同被引文献296

引证文献28

二级引证文献221

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部