摘要
目的:比较穴位埋线与常规针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效差异。方法:将140例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组各70例。治疗组采用羊肠线穴位埋线,每周1次,3次为一疗程;对照组采用常规针刺,隔天1次,10次为一疗程。结果:治疗组治疗1个疗程和随访3个月后的有效率分别为95·6%、88·2%,均优于对照组的84·6%、72·3%(均P<0·05)。结论:穴位埋线法疗效较好。
Objective To compare therapeutic effects of catgut implantation at acupoint and routine acupuncture on prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc. Methods One hundred and forty cases were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group, 70 cases in each group. The treatment group were treated with catgut implantation at acupoint, once each week, 3 sessions constituting one course, and the control group with routine acupuncture, once every other day, 10 sessions constituting one course. Results The effective rate was 95.6% after treatment of one course and 88. 2% 3 months later in the treatment group, which were better than 84. 6% and 72.3% in the con trol group, respectively （Both P〈0. 05）. Conclusion Catgut implantation at aeupoint has a better therapeutic effect on prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc, with lower cost.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第3期195-197,共3页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
基金
浙江省富阳市科学技术局资助科研课题:03B50
关键词
椎间盘移位/穴位疗法
腰椎
埋线
Intervertebral Disk Displaeement/acupoint ther
Lumbar Vertebrae
Embedding, Thread
