期刊文献+

基于生态足迹模型的区域可持续发展定量分析——以山东省烟台市为例 被引量:5

Regional Sustainable Development Based on Ecological Footprint Theory——A Case Study of Yantai City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 生态足迹方法是一种定量评价可持续发展程度的生物物理方法。通过测算人类的生态足迹与生态承载力之间的差距,定量地判断区域的发展是否处于生态承载力的范围之内,为评价区域的可持续发展提供依据。在介绍生态足迹、生态承载力的基础上,运用生态足迹模型对烟台市2002年的生态足迹进行了计算分析,结果表明烟台市2002年人均生态赤字为1.079 hm2,远远超出了其生态承载力,说明烟台市的发展处于不可持续状态。最后,提出了提高区域生态承载力,实现可持续发展的一些对策。 The ecological footprint method is a biophysical assessment method ical capacity, measuring the ecological imperative of sustainability. Human of the human appropriation of ecologconsume products and services of nature; each of us have an impact on the earth. By calculating the difference between ecological footprint and ecological capacity, we can estimate whether it is in a sustainable status or not. This paper introduces the concepts of ecological footprint, the calculation model and the ecological capacity. According to the calculation model, ecological deficit of Yantai is 1.0789 ha per capita, which shows that Yantai City is in a unsustainable status. At last, measures are suggested to increase regional ecosystem's carrying capacity and to make the development sustainable.
出处 《水土保持通报》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期71-74,共4页 Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 国家自然科学基金(10171075) "城市快速扩展过程中生态与人居环境演变规律研究(BK2004164)"
关键词 生态足迹 生态承载力 生物生产面积 可持续发展 烟台市 ecological footprint ecological capacity ecological productive area sustainable development Yantai City
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献21

  • 1[4]HARD P, BARG S, HODGE T, et al. Measuring Sustainable Development: Review of Current Practices [R].Toronto: International Institute for Sustainable Development, 1997.
  • 2[5]REES W. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out [J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2), 121-130.
  • 3[6]HANLEY N, MOFFATT I, FAICHNEY R, et al. Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for Scottland [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999 (1),28 : 55-73.
  • 4[7]CASTA? EDA B E. An index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Chile [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,28(1) :231-244.
  • 5[8]HAMILTON C. The genuine progress indicators methodological development and results from Australia [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 30 (1) : 13-28.
  • 6[9]WACKERNAGEL M, ONISTO L, BELLO P. Ecological Footprints of Nations [EB/OL]. http: \www. ecouncil.ac. cr/rio/focus/report/english/footprint/2003-10-12.
  • 7[10]WACKERNAGEL M, ONISTO L, BELLO P, et al.National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(3):375-390.
  • 8[11]REES W, WACKERNAGEL M. Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable-and why they are a key to sustainability [J]. Environment Impact Assess Review, 1996(4-6),16: 223-248.
  • 9[14]HABERL H, ERB K, et al. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995 [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 38(1):25-45.
  • 10辽宁统计局.辽宁统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社.2003.

共引文献1469

同被引文献58

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部