期刊文献+

指称转喻的回指照应机制 被引量:8

The Anaphoric Reference Mechanism of the Referential Metonymy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在包含指称转喻关系的语句中,谓项与其论元之间的语义冲突是标量性的,冲突的大小决定了转喻关系中源域成分和靶域成分的相对突显度,语义冲突大,则靶域成分被逼显,从而倾向于被后续话语中的代词回指;语义冲突小,则源域成分因其仍处于活跃状态并占据话题位置而跃居突显地位,从而倾向于被后续话语中的代词回指,这是指称转喻的回指照应机制。 This paper proposes that in a referentially metonymic sentence, the semantic dissonance between the predicate and its argument is scalar, and that the strength of dissonance determines the relative salience of the source element and the target element. When the dissonance is larger, the target element is forced out and it tends to be referred to by the anaphoric pronoun; by contrast, when the dissonance is smaller, the source element becomes salient due to its being in an active state and in the topic position, and it tends to be referred to by the anaphoric pronoun. This is the anaphoric reference mechanism of the referential metonymy.
作者 韩丹 许宁云
出处 《解放军外国语学院学报》 北大核心 2006年第2期6-10,共5页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
关键词 指称转喻 回指照应机制 语义冲突 标量性 referential metonymy anaphofic reference mechanism semantic dissonance scalar
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1许宁云,韩丹.非常规间接前指照应的释义策略[J].外语学刊,2005(2):50-53. 被引量:5
  • 2Barcelona,Antonio.Introduction:The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy[A].Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads[C].Ed.Antonio Barcelona.Berlin and New York:Mouton de Gruyter,2000.1-15.
  • 3Fass,D.C.Processing Metonymy and Metaphor[A].Contemporary Studies in Cognitive Science and Technology Vol.1[C].Ablex Publishing,Westport,CT,1997.
  • 4Feyaerts,Kurt.Refining the inheritance hypothesis:Interaction between metaphoric and metonymic hierarchies[A].Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads[C].Ed.Antonio Barcelona.Berlin and New York:Mouton de Gruyter,2000.59-78.
  • 5Gibbs,R.The Poetics of Mind,Figurative Thought,Language and Understanding[M].Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,1994.
  • 6Hobbs,J.R.,M.E.Stickel,D.E.Appelt & P.Martin.Interpretation as abduction[J].Artificial Intelligence 63 (1993):69-142.
  • 7Lakoff,G.& M.Johnson.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago,IL:University of Chicago Press,1980.
  • 8Papafragou,Anna.On metonymy[J].Lingua 99 (1996):169-195.
  • 9Pustejovsky,J.The generative lexicon[J].Computational Linguistics 17.4 (1991):409 -441.
  • 10Ruizde Mendoza,Ibánez & J.Francisco.The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy[A].Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads[C].Ed.Antonio Barcelona.Berlin and New York:Mouton de Gruyter,2000.109-132.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Ariel, Mira. Privileged interactional interpretations[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2002(34) :1003-1044.
  • 2Chafe, Wallace L. Givenness, contrastness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view[A]. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and Topic[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1976:25-55.
  • 3Charolles, M. Associative anaphora and its interpretation[J]. Journal of Pragmaties, 1999(31):311-326.
  • 4Du Bois, John W. Beyond definiteness: the trace of identity in discourse[A]. In Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.), The Pear Stories. Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood[C]. NJ: Ablex, 1980:203-274.
  • 5Heim, Irene R. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases[D]. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation. University of Massachusetts,Amherst, 1982.
  • 6Kadmon, Nirit. Uniqueness[J]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1990(13):273-324.
  • 7Kaup, B., S. Kelter and C. Habel. Taking the functional aspect of mental models as a starting point for studying disc ourse comprehension[A]. In G. Rickheit and C. Habel (eds), Mental Models in Disc ourse Processing and Reasoning[C]. Amsterdam: Elsevier,1999.
  • 8Langacker R. Grammar and Conceptualization[M]. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.
  • 9Mieville, Denis. Associate Anaphora: an attempt at formalization[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1999(31):327-337.
  • 10Rickheit, G. and C. Habel. Mental models: some answers, some questions, some suggestions[A]. In G. Rickheit and C. Habel (eds), Mental Models in Discourse Processing and Reasoning[C]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1999.

共引文献4

同被引文献161

引证文献8

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部