摘要
目的 通过调查不同人群对氟牙症照片的评价，了解公众对氟牙症可能给患者造成的社会心理影响的看法。方法 在河北邢台、广州及北京共选取口腔医师101名、口腔专业学生118名、非口腔专业学生103名、职员102名及国家机关、党群组织及企、事业单位负责人92名作为评价者，对20张不同程度氟牙症照片进行评价，各包括7个不同心理方面的5度分法评价题。结果 公众评价均值随氟牙症的加重而升高（2．21～4．74），极轻度及以下（DI≤1）氟牙症可能影响患者社会心理状况的比例在30％以下，轻度氟牙症（DI=2）可能对患者社会心理影响的比例为25％～56％，而重度氟牙症（DI≥3）的比例为48％～97％。不同程度氟牙症患者与其社会心理评价之间均存在显著相关性（r=0．671～0．813）。口腔医师的评价显著低于口腔专业学生、非口腔专业学生及职员的评价。河北邢台公众评价显著高于北京或广州公众。结论轻度以下氟牙症对患者可能造成的社会心理影响较小。
Objective To explore the attitude of the public to the psychosocial effects of fluorosis through investigating the public in different areas. Methods Twenty typical fluomsis photos were selected and evaluated by the public in Xingtai, Beijing and Guangzhou, which included 101 dentists, 118 dental students, 103 college students in non-dental schools, 102 clerks and 92 leaders. Each evaluator was required to answer seven five-point questions according to each photo. Results The mean of the public evaluation was going up with the increase of Dean＇s Index （DI） score, ranging from 2. 21 to 4.74, meanwhile, the prevalence of reporting that fluomsis would affect their psychosocial status also ascended. Less than 25% people reported that very mild fluomsis （ DI ≤ 1 ） would affect the psychosocial status of patients, and mild fluomsis （ DI = 2） would affect 25% -56%, while the prevalence would increase to 48% - 97% in severe fluomsis group （DI ≥3）. ＂Bivariate Correlation Analysis＂ showed that significant correlation existed in the evaluation of the public and the degree of fluomsis. The scores of dentists were significantly lower than those of dental students, college students in non-dental schools and clerks. The evaluation scores of the public in Xingtai were generally higher than those in Beijing and Guangzhou. Conclusions Mild or less fluorosis could lead to little psychosocial effects.
出处
《中华口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第3期172-174,共3页
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
关键词
氟中毒
牙
心理学
社会
评价研究
Fluorosis,dental
Psychology,social
Evaluation studies
