摘要
财产权劳动理论会产生扩大知识产权保护范围的危险,导致知识产权界定的困难和社会公共利益与私人利益之间的矛盾。知识产权法定主义具有创权和限权的双重功效;知识产权制度的创设是一个以自由为起点、以社会整体效率为连接点、以社会正义为依归的完整链条;知识产权司法应当坚持整体性观念。虽然在知识产权特别法之外存在适用传统民法和反不正当竞争法的可能性,但在这种情况下法律所禁止的只是某种行为样态,保护的只是某种利益或优势,这种保护并不意味着原告享有某种特定的知识产权。
Lockean＇ Labour Theory of Property implies a kind of inner danger to infinitely expand the protection scopes of intellectual property, resulting in the difficulties in defining its boundary , and the contradictions between public interests and private interests. Numberus Clausus of intellectual property has dual roles to confer and restrict the right of intellectual property. Intellectual property is such a system that begins from freedom and advances toward social justice through social efficiency. The judicial system about intellectual property should hold the idea of integrity. Although beyond the statute of intellectual property, civil law and anti - unfair competition- law may be applied in some cases to prohibit certain act, what they protect is only a kind of benefit or advantage rather than a certain kind of intellectual property right.
出处
《法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第2期3-16,共14页
Chinese Journal of Law
关键词
知识产权
自然权利
法定主义
intellectual property rights, natural right, numberus clauses
