摘要
刘善经《四声指归》、《梁书.钟嵘传》、《南史》、《钟嵘传》和《丘迟传》所录钟嵘《诗品》资料与宋元以后刊行的《诗品》相比,有其无可比拟的文献价值,尤其是《梁书.钟嵘传》所录为完整的一篇《诗品序》,研究价值尤高。然而在实际的《诗品》研究中,往往存在用后来版本的文字判定隋、唐初人所录为讹误的颠倒是非的情况。这应引起人们对隋、唐初人所录《诗品》资料的足够重视,希望能够在更加接近《诗品》原来文献面目的基础上进一步提高对这一中国古代诗歌批评名著的研究水平。
Materials related to Zhong Rong＇s Shi Pin recorded in Liu Shanjing＇s works such as Si Sheng Zhi Gui, Liang Shu·Zhong Rong Zhuan, Nan Shi, A biography of Zhong Rong, A biograhy of Qiuchi and Nan Shi are much more valuable compared to Shi Pin published after the Song and Yuan Dynasties, among which a whole Preface to Shi Pin recorded in Liang Shu·Zhong Rong Zhuan is of more research value. However, in the actual research in Shi Pin, editions published later are often used to criticize the materials recorded in the early period of Sui and Tang Dynasties for their errors, which is a case of confusing truth and falsehood. And this should arouse people＇ s attention to the materials about Shi Pin recorded in Sui and Tang Dynasties. The author hopes that the research level of ancient chinese peetry criticism masterpieces can be improved on the basis of being close to the original bibliography about Shi Pin.
出处
《许昌学院学报》
CAS
2006年第1期36-40,共5页
Journal of Xuchang University
关键词
钟嵘
《诗品》
隋唐文献
《梁书·钟嵘传》
Zhong Rong
Shi Pin
the bibliography of Sui dynasty and Tang dynasty
