摘要
犯罪论体系的核心内容是价值判断,如何实现合理性的价值判断是犯罪论体系构建的首要目标。对于价值判断,在大陆法系犯罪论体系的发展过程中存在过实证主义、新康德主义、现象学和目的论等解决途径,这些解决途径都难以在实质和形式两个方面保证价值判断的合理性。根据主体间性和法律论证理论,如果能够以法益保护原则、责任原则和罪刑法定原则作为犯罪论体系中价值判断的前提,并且遵循一定的程序要求就可以最大限度的实现合理性要求。
The core of the criminology system is the value choice. Its chief topic is how to choose reasonable values. As far as the value choice is concerned, the theories basing on positivism, Kantism, phenomenology and teleology have been put forward as approaches of solution in the development of criminology in the Continental law system, while none of them is capable to realize the rationality of value choice both substantially and formally. According to the intersubjectivity and legal argument theory, if the principles of interest protection, liability and presefibod crime and penalty are held as the premise of the value choice in the criminology system, and if some procedures are requested to be followed, the rationality can be realized to the greatest degree.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第3期55-62,共8页
Law and Social Development
基金
吉林大学哲学社会科学研究青年基金项目:罪刑法定原则与犯罪构成理论(2004QN024)。
关键词
事实判断
价值判断
价值祛除
实体性论证规则
the judgment about fact
the choice of value
de - valued
the substantive argument rule
