期刊文献+

添加有机酸强化粗颗粒石灰石烟气脱硫 被引量:21

Wet flue gas desulfurization by organic acid-enhanced coarse limestone
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统石灰石湿法烟气脱硫成本高的问题,提出了一种新型石灰石石膏法烟气脱硫方法,即通过在石灰石浆液中加入有机酸,采用大尺寸石灰石165~200μm(-80+100目)代替传统的47μm(325目)以下的细颗粒石灰石进行脱硫,同时在鼓泡搅拌吸收反应器脱硫装置上与传统石灰石湿法烟气脱硫进行了对比实验.研究结果表明,只采用165~200μm石灰石浆液直接脱硫其脱硫率和石灰石利用率分别为60.7%和44%,但当石灰石(165~200μm)浆液中乙酸浓度达到10~30mmol·L-1,其脱硫率和石灰石利用率分别为95%和93.5%,都达到甚至优于传统石灰石脱硫中的结果,新型石灰石湿法脱硫系统的pH值在正常的脱硫区间波动也较小.在此基础上,提出了添加乙酸促进SO2吸收的机理.本文提出的新型烟气脱硫方法具有很好的工业应用前景. A new wet FGD process in which SO2 was absorbed in the bubble reactor using granular limestone and acetic acid was proposed. The main difference as compared with the conventional wet FGD process was to utilize granular limestone directly as desulphurization reagent with simultaneous addition of acetic acid. Thus, the pulverization of limestone, which causes power consumption, could be saved. By using granular limestone (165-200 μm) directly as absorbent only without acetic acid, SO2 removal efficiency and limestone utilization were too low, 60. 7% and 44% respectively. By adding 10-30 mmol ·L^-1 acetic acid, desulphurization was increased to 95% and limestone utilization was enhanced to 93.5%. The desulphurization efficiency and limestone utilization of using fine limestone were 88% and 92.9% respectively under the same operating conditions. The buffer capacity of system was also enhanced by adding organic acid. With concentrations of 5 and 10 mmol·L^-1 acetic acid, it took 45 min for the pH value to drop from 6.0 to 4. 0. Furthermore, with increasing organic acid concentration the effect of buffer action was more obvious. It could better adapt to the fluctuation of SO2 concentration of flue gas, make operation more flexible, and improve process reliability. The mechanism of promoting SO2 absorption by acetic acid was suggested.
出处 《化工学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期927-931,共5页 CIESC Journal
关键词 新型湿法烟气脱硫 有机酸 鼓泡吸收反应器 粗颗粒石灰石 new wet FGD organic acid bubbling reactor granular limestone
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Xiao Wende (肖文德),Wu Zhiquan (吴志泉).Sulfur Dioxide Removal and Recovery (二氧化硫脱除与回收).Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2002:90
  • 2Hirofumi Kikkawa,Takanori Nakamoto.New wet FGD process using granular limestone.Ind.Eng.Chem.Res.,2002,41:3028-3036
  • 3Mobley J David,Cassidy Margery.Organic acids can enhance wet limestone flue gas scrubbing.Power Engineering,1986,24(6):32-35
  • 4Mobley J D,Chang C S.The adipic acid enhances limestone flue gas desulfurization process:an assessment.Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association,1981,31(12):1249-1253
  • 5Chang C S,Mobley J D.Testing and commercialization of byproduct dibasic acid as buffer additives for limestone flue gas desulfurization systerms.Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association,1983,33(10):955-962
  • 6Rochelle Gary T,Weems William.Buffer additives for lime/limestone slurry scrubbing.Washington,D.C.:American Chemical Society Press,1982:243-265
  • 7Chang ChungShih,Herbert Dempsey J.Effect of limestone type and grind on SO2 scrubber performance.Environmental Progress,1982,1(1):59-64
  • 8Jan B,Frandsen W.Optimization of a wet FGD pilot plant using fine limestone and organic acids.Chemical Engineering Science,2001(56):3275-3287
  • 9Rochelle R T,King C J.The effect of additives on mass transfer in CaCO3 and CaO slurry scrubbing of SO2 from waste gases.Industrial and Engineering Chemistry,Fundamentals,1977,16(1):67-75

同被引文献178

引证文献21

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部