期刊文献+

剖宫产手术腰麻中腰麻液比重的影响 被引量:13

Comparative Study of Isobaric and Hyperbaric Solution of Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia in Caesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较等比重与重比重布比卡因腰麻在剖宫产手术中应用的优缺点。方法 选择ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ级的拟行剖宫产手术病例100例.随机分为等比重组(Ⅰ组,50例)或重比重组(H组,50例),用CSEA(联合腰麻硬膜外麻醉)技术的针内针法经L2-3,实施腰麻,均采用0.5%布比卡因2ml,比较两组患者围术期血流动力学变化及注药后病人的反应、麻醉起效及消退时间、感觉阻滞的峰平面等。结果 两组均取得良好的麻醉效果。注药后5~15min出现明显血压下降而需应用麻黄素处理的H组有12例,Ⅰ组仅2例(P〈0.01)。两组病人麻醉起效时间相近。与Ⅰ组相比,H组病例感觉阻滞达峰平面较Ⅰ组快,且峰平面较Ⅰ组高(阻滞节段数较多),感觉阻滞平面下降2节段的时间较Ⅰ组短,伤口疼痛出现较1组早(P〈0.01),运动殂滞消退较Ⅰ组快(P〈0.05)。结论 在剖宫产手术中,等比重液腰麻较重比重液腰麻具有明显的优越性。 Objective To compare the application of isobaric and hyperbaric solution of bupivacacine for spinal anesthesia in caesarean section and provide reference materials for clinical practice. Methods One hundred ASA physical status Ⅲ full term pregnant woman planed to receive cesarean section under spinal anesthesia (using CSEA technique via spinal needle in epidural needle) were randomized to receive subarachnoid injection of 2.0ml (10mg) isobaric (group Ⅰ, 50 cases) or hyperbaric (group H, 50 cases) bupivacaine and then turned supine. Perioperative hemodynamic parameters and patients' anesthesia responses were monitored, including the time of onset and motor block, peak sensory blocked level, the time to regression of 2 dermatornes, the time to the first administration of analgesics, the time to the regression of motor block to modified Bromage scale 2. Results Both isobaric and hyperbaric 0..5 % bupivacaine solutions in a volume of 2.0 ml provided effective sensory and motor block. Time to onset and complete motor block was similar. Compared with group Ⅰ, the time to peak sensory block was shorter, peak sensory block level was higher (maximal dermatomes of blocked sensory nerves were more), time to regression of sensory and motor block was shorter, the incidence of uncomfortable feeling,, nausea, vomit and hypotension was higher in group H. Conclusion Spinal anesthesia with isobaric solution is superior to that with hyperbaric solution as the hemodynamic parameters are relatively stable, the lower incidence of uncomfortable feelings, the lower incidence of other adverse effects, and its longer duration of anesthesia and analgesia.
出处 《实用预防医学》 CAS 2006年第2期386-387,共2页 Practical Preventive Medicine
关键词 剖宫产 腰麻 等比重 重比重 布比卡因 Caesarean section Spinal anesthesia Isobaric Hyperbaric
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献19

  • 1计家兴,李江悦.胃复安与吗啡硬膜外术后镇痛比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,1996,12(4):215-215. 被引量:6
  • 2谢荣 刘亚军.我国临床应用硬膜外阻滞的调查报告[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1991,11(4):240-240.
  • 3Horford WE 王俊科(译).临床麻醉手册(第5版)[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1999.402-402.
  • 4[4]Harding SA, Collis RE, Morgan BM. Meningitis after combined spinal extralural anesthesia in obstetrics. British Journal of Anesthesia, 1994: 73: 545 ~ 547
  • 5王俊科(译),临床麻醉手册(第5版),1999年,402页
  • 6谢荣,麻醉学(第3版),1994年,331页
  • 7Liu SS, McDonald SB. Update of spinal anesthesia [J]. Anesthesiology,2001,94(5):887-905.
  • 8Greene NM. Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space[J]. Anesth Analg, 1985,64(6):715-730.
  • 9谢荣.麻醉学(第三版)[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.331.
  • 10Bromage PR, Wildsmith JAW, Covino BG, et al. Effect of baricity on spinal anesthesia with amethocaine[J].Br J Anesth,1980,52(12):589-595.

共引文献59

同被引文献62

引证文献13

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部