急性冠脉综合征介入治疗与保守治疗的评价被引量：3

Revascularization Strategy for Acute Coronary Syndromes:Early Invasive or Early Conservative?

下载PDF

导出

摘要非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征是冠心病患者最常见的住院原因之一,已公布的随机临床试验的结果显示,采取早期侵入治疗策略有利于降低此类患者不良临床事件的发生率,并改善其预后。但在如何选择理想的早期侵入治疗时间,以及合并不同疾病患者的治疗选择等问题上,仍需要进一步研究。无论选择何种治疗策略,合理使用抗栓药物治疗以及冠心病的二级预防都应该是非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者治疗策略的重要组成部分。 Non-ST-segment elevated acute coronary syndrome is the most common cause of cardiac hospital admissions, and the evidence from published clinical trials reveals that early invasive strategy can reduce the rate of adverse cardiovascular events. Some aspects of this issue require further study. These include the optimal invasive treatment time and treatment strategy for those patients with comorbid conditions. Antithrombotic therapy and the secondary prevention for coronary artery disease should be important elements of any treatment for acute coronary syndrome.

作者马长生

机构地区首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心内科

出处《心血管病学进展》 CAS 2006年第3期257-261,共5页 Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases

关键词急性冠脉综合征介入治疗保守治疗 acute coronary syndromes early invasive early conservative

分类号 R541.4 [医药卫生—心血管疾病]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Braunwald E,Antman EM,Beasley JW,et al.ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-summary article:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina)[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,40:1366-1374.
2American Heart Association.Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2004 Update[R].Dallas:American Heart Association,2004.
3Anonymous.Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.Results of the TIMI ⅢB trial.Thrombolysis in myocardial ischemia[J].Circulation,1994,89:1545-1556.
4Boden WE,O'Rourke RA,Crawford MH,et al.Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy.Veterans Affairs non-Q Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators[J].N Engl J Med,1998,338:1785-1792.
5Fragmin and Fast Revascularisation during Instability in coronary artery disease Investigators.Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease:FRISC Ⅱ prospective randomised multicentre study[J].Lancet,1999,354:708-715.
6Cannon CP,Weintraub WS,Demopoulos LA,et al.Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitor tirofiban[J].N Engl J Med,2001,344:1879-1887.
7Fox KA,Poole-Wilson PA,Henderson RA,et al.Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction:the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial.Randomized intervention trial of unstable angina[J].Lancet,2002,360:743-751.
8Fox KA,Poole-Wilson P,Clayton T,et al.5-year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome:The British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial[J].Lancet,2005,366:914-920.
9Faxon DP.A Highlights from the European Society of Cardiology Congress[J].Rev Cardiovasc Med,2004,5(4):223-225.
10Mehta SR,Cannon CP,Fox KAA,et al.Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes:a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials[J].JAMA,2005,293:2908-2917.