期刊文献+

基于故障树的系统安全风险实时监测方法 被引量:5

Real-time Monitoring Method for System Safety Based on Fault Tree
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前的安全性分析方法大都属于预先安全性分析方法,即在系统使用前对系统进行安全性分析。但系统的动态特性,如组成部件工作状态的动态变化,使系统的安全性呈现实时变化。为研究系统的实时安全风险,提出了一种基于故障树的实时安全风险监测方法。该方法用故障树表示系统结构,建立系统安全风险评估模型,根据系统的技术状态参数与系统组件工作状态的对应关系,实时对系统的安全风险进行监测;并根据安全风险监测的情况,对安全风险变化原因做出解释,做到防患于未然。用一个具有前馈控制冷却系统的例子演示了该方法的有效性。 Most of the current methods for safety analysis belong to the scope of safety pre-analyzing, which analyzes the system safety before system being in service. But the system safety is full of variety because of the system's dynamic characteristic, such as the nmning status variation of system component. In order to know well the real-time safety risk, a real-time monitoring method for system safety is proposed. The safety risk model was estabhshed on the fault tree that was used to represent logic structure of system. The real- time safety risk was monitored according to the correspondence between technical status of system component and naming status of system component. Simultaneously the method could account for the change of risks, thus ensuing the taking of precautions. Finally a case monitoring the safety risk for cooling system with pre-feedhack was used to demomtrate the effectiveness of the method.
出处 《国防科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第2期111-116,共6页 Journal of National University of Defense Technology
基金 国家部委基金资助项目(2005AA845023)
关键词 实时安全风险 故障树 监测 预先安全性分析 real-time safety risk fault tree monitoring safety pre-analyzing
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Zhong M,Zhang X K,Wei X,et al.Safety Evaluation of Engineering and Construction Projects in China[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2003,16:201-207.
  • 2Marseguerra M,Zio E.Monte Carlo Approach to PSA for Dynamic Process Systems[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1996,(52):227-241.
  • 3Amari S,Dill G,Howald E.A New Approach to Solve Dynamic Fault Trees[A].2003 Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium[C],2003:374-379.
  • 4董豆豆,周经伦,冯静,龚时雨,周忠宝.基于概率风险的系统安全性分析[J].国防科技大学学报,2005,27(1):98-101. 被引量:7
  • 5冯静,吴孟达.Profust故障树建模与分析[J].国防科技大学学报,2001,23(1):85-88. 被引量:6
  • 6Tim B,Roger C.Probabilistic Risk Analysis:Foundations and Methods[M].uk:Cambridge University Press,2001.
  • 7亨利EJ.可靠性工程与风险分析[M].北京:原子能出版社,1988..

二级参考文献7

  • 1Cai K Y,Microelectron Reliab,1993年,33卷,15期,2253页
  • 2史定华,故障树分析方法和理论,1993年
  • 3梅启智,系统可靠性工程基础,1987年
  • 4Christian P. Safety Risk Assessment and Management-the ESA Approach[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1995,49:303-309.
  • 5Pate-Cornell E, Dillon R. Probabilistic Risk Analysis for the NASA Space Shuttle: A Brief History and Current Work [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2001,74:345-352.
  • 6Jaynes E T. Prior Probability[J]. IEEE Tran. on Systems Science and Cybernetic. SSC-4, 1986:227-241.
  • 7Stein C. Approximation of Improper Measures by Prior Probability Measure [M]. In Bernoulli-Bayes-Laplace Festschr, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1965:217-240.

共引文献14

同被引文献66

引证文献5

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部