期刊文献+

Evaluation and selection of the ship collaborative design resources based on AHP and genetic and simulated annealing algorithm 被引量:1

Evaluation and selection of the ship collaborative design resources based on AHP and genetic and simulated annealing algorithm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The characteristics of the design resources in the ship collaborative design is described and the hierarchical model for the evaluation of the design resources is established. The comprehensive evaluation of the co-designers for the collaborative design resources has been done from different aspects using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) ,and according to the evaluation results,the candidates are determined. Meanwhile,based on the principle of minimum cost,and starting from the relations between the design tasks and the corresponding co-designers,the optimizing selection model of the collaborators is established and one novel genetic combined with simulated annealing algorithm is proposed to realize the optimization. It overcomes the defects of the genetic algorithm which may lead to the premature convergenee and local optimization if used individually. Through the application of this method in the ship collaborative design system,it proves the feasibility and provides a quantitative method for the optimizing selection of the design resources.
出处 《Journal of Marine Science and Application》 2006年第1期23-30,共8页 船舶与海洋工程学报(英文版)
基金 SupportedbyHeilongjiangProvinceProgramme(No.WC05A01).
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980
  • 2Kaufmamm A,Gupta M M.Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic Theory and Applications. New York: van Nostrand Reinhold,1991
  • 3Gunaskekaran A. Agile Manufacturing Enablers and an Implementation Framework. International Journal of Production Research, 1998,36(5):1223~1247
  • 4Yu C S. A GP-AHP Method for Solving Group Decision-making Fuzzy AHP Problems. Computer & Operation Research, 2002, 29:1969~2001
  • 5Maggie C Y, Rao V M. An Application of the AHP in Vendor Selection of a Telecommunications System. Omega, 2001, 29(2):171~182
  • 6刘新宪. 选择与判断. 上海:上海科学普及出版社,1990
  • 7胡永宏,贺思辉. 综合评价方法. 北京:科学出版社,2000
  • 8Zhu K J, Yu J. A Discussion on Extent Analysis Method and Applications of Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 116:450~456
  • 9钱碧波,潘晓弘,程耀东.敏捷虚拟企业合作伙伴选择评价体系研究[J].中国机械工程,2000,11(4):397-401. 被引量:138

共引文献19

同被引文献5

  • 1HU Jianwen,ZHANG Weiming,LIU Zhong,HU Xiaofeng,SI Guangya.A novel complex-system-view-based method for system effectiveness analysis: Monotonic indexes space[J].Science in China(Series F),2006,49(1):90-102. 被引量:1
  • 2[1]FULVIO E.System efficiency/merit (A total system evaluation)[A].Aerospace and Electronics Conference[C].Dayton,1998.
  • 3[4]MENG Qingyu,ZHANG Jingyuan,SONG Baowei.Analysis of operational effectiveness for Torpedo[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,2003(in Chinese).
  • 4[5]ZHOU Yuanquan,WENG Chaoxi.Reliability evaluation[M].Beijing:Science Press,1990 (in Chinese).
  • 5[6]CHEN Chunyu,ZHANG Jingyuan,WANG Mingzhou,et al.Anti-torpedo Technology[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,2006(in Chinese).

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部