摘要
目的:考察社会比较倾向量表中文版的信度和效度。方法:两个样本共计1023名被试完成社会比较倾向量表的问卷调查。结果:项目分析显示,11个题目在项目-总分相关及项目鉴别度上均符合测量学要求。探索性因素分析获得两个因素:能力和观念,累计解释的方差为55．6％;验证性因素分析验证了双维的量表结构(CMIN／DF=3．91,CFI=0．96,GFI=0．95,AGFI=0．96,RMSEA=0．05)。量表的内部一致性信度系数为0．88,四周后重测信度为0．89。分析显示,男性被试的得分(39．4±8．7)显著低于女性被试的得分(41．4±7．3,P<0．01,t=-4．06);学生样本的得分(41．3±7．5)显著高于员工样本 (39．5±8．6,t=3．48,P<0．01);量表与各效标量表的相关关系符合理论预期,具有较好的效标关联效度。结论:本研究修订的社会比较倾向量表具有较好的信度、效度,可以满足今后国内有关研究和应用的需要。
Objective： To revise the Chinese version of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale. Methods： The questionnaire was administered to two samples with total of 1023 individuals. Results： The item analysis showed that all of the 11 items met psychometric criteria. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the Chinese version of Social Comparison Scale was composed of two dimensions, which were ability and concept, which can explained 55. 6% of total variance. The internal consistency reliability was 0. 88 and the four weeks test-retest reliability coefficient was 0. 89. The further analysis revealed that the male sample had significantly lower scores than female sample （ 39. 4 ± 8. 7/41.4 ±7. 3, t = -4. 06）, and the employee sample had significantly lower scores than student sample （39. 5 ± 8. 6/41.3 ±7. 5, t = -3. 98, P 〈0. 01 ） . The discrimination validity and the convergent validity were also examined. Condusion： The revised Chinese version of the Social Comparison Scale with acceptable psychometric quality can be applied in related psychological research areas.
出处
《中国心理卫生杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第5期302-305,316,共5页
Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金
国家自然科学基金重点项目资助(70432002)
关键词
社会比较
心理测量学研究
信度
效度
social comparison
psychometric studies
reliability
validation
