期刊文献+

现实主义理论的内部论争及其发展方向 被引量:4

Intra-realist Debates and Its Orientations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,由于主流理论与非主流理论缺乏实质性的对话,范式间辩论陷入僵局。相比较而言,现实主义理论内部的论争变得活跃,值得重视和关注。通过对进攻性现实主义、防御性现实主义、新古典现实主义等三个分支的简要评析,文章总结了近年来现实主义发展的特征和趋势,并从理论建构和理论检验两个角度提出了现实主义未来发展的方向。 In resent years,inter-paradigm debates have reached a deadlock and there is no substantial dialogue between mainstream and non-mainstream theories.Comparatively speaking,Intra-realist debates are very active and worth paying more attention to.Based on the review of some new variants in realist school,such as offensive realism,defensive realism and neo-classical realism,this paper summarizes the characteristics and trends of the latest development of the realist school.
作者 刘丰
出处 《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期7-11,共5页 International Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1[挪威]伊弗·B.诺伊曼等.《未来国际思想大师》[M].北京大学出版社,2003年版,第一章.
  • 2John J. Mearsheimer, "The False Promise of International Institutions," International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3 (Winter 1994/95), pp. 37-47.
  • 3John J. Mearsheimer, "A Realist Reply," lnternational Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Summer 1995),pp. 90-92.
  • 4Gunthar Helmann, "Forum: Are Dialogue and Synthesis Possible in International Relations?" International Studies Review, Vol. 5, No. 1 (March 2003), pp. 123-153.
  • 5Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass. : Addison-Wesley, 1979), pp. 71-72.
  • 6John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (N. Y. : W.W. Norton & Company, 2001), p. 21.
  • 7苏长和.即将到来的大国冲突?——《大国政治的悲剧》及其思考[J].世界经济与政治,2003(4):73-76. 被引量:11
  • 8张睿壮,教授.现实主义的持久生命力[J].世界经济与政治,2004(7):29-30. 被引量:21
  • 9Glenn H. Snyder, "Mearsheimer's World: Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security", International Security,Vol.27,No.1(Summer 2002),p.151.
  • 10Waltz, Theory of International Politics, pp. 107-111.

二级参考文献20

共引文献56

同被引文献51

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部