期刊文献+

^(99m)Tc腮腺动态显像对干燥综合征诊断价值的研究 被引量:6

The research of quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy in the diagnosis of Sjgren's syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨^(99m)Tc腮腺动态显像诊断干燥综合征的价值。方法对临床诊断为干燥综合征(SS)的40例患者以及29例对照组进行^(99m)Tc腮腺动态显像,以摄取值和分泌率为定量指标,利用受试者工作曲线(ROC)确定摄取值和分泌率的最佳临界点,根据ROC曲线下面积(AUC^(ROC))评价^(99m)Tc腮腺动态显像对SS的诊断价值。结果摄取值的最佳诊断值为5.5~5.7,分泌率的最佳诊断值为0.20。在最佳诊断值水平摄取值和分泌率对诊断干燥综合征有较高的敏感度(86.2%~89.7%)。摄取值的特异度较低(63.4%~65.9%),分泌率的特异度较高(82.9%~85.4%)。摄取值和分泌率AUC^(ROC)的分别为0.780/0.776及0.905/0.899,较接近1.0。结论^(99m)‰Tc腮腺动态显像对诊断干燥综合征具有较好的价值。 Objective The purpose of this study is to determine whether the quantitative parameters of salivary gland scintigraphy are useful in the diagnosis of Sjoegren's syndrome (SS). Method Forty patients with SS and 29 control subjects underwent salivary gland scintigraphy. Two indices, uptake ratio and maximum secretion were mearsured. The optimal cut-points of both indices were derived from receiver operative characteristic curve (ROC). The diagnostic value of the indices was assessed by the area under ROC curve (AUC^ROC). Results The optimal cut-point of uptake ratio was 5.5-5.7. The optimal cut-point of maximum secretion was 0.20. The sensitivities of both indices were 86.2%-89.7%. The specificity of uptake ratio was 63.4 %-65.9%. The specificity of maximum secretion was 82.9%-85.4%. The AUC^ROC of uptake ratio was 0.780/0.776. The AUC^ROC of maximum secretion was 0.905/0.899. Conclusion The quantitative parameters of salivary gland scintigraphy may be useful in the diagnosis of Sjoegren syndrome.
出处 《中华风湿病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2006年第6期335-337,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
关键词 干燥综合征 腮腺 放射性核素显像 Sjoegren's syndrome Parotid gland Radionuclide imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献6

同被引文献42

  • 1李明,朱芸,马晶晶,赵雪丽.改良式唇腺活检术在干燥综合征诊断中的应用[J].现代诊断与治疗,2012,23(5):474-475. 被引量:5
  • 2王松灵,邹兆菊.慢性阻塞性腮腺炎腮腺造影与临床,病理对照研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1993,28(4):228-230. 被引量:11
  • 3吉野教夫,王松灵,邹兆菊,朱宣智.舍格伦综合征的诊断标准及分型的评价[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1994,29(6):377-379. 被引量:14
  • 4CHISIN R,MARKITZIU A,HOFFER S,et al. The clinical value of quantitative dynamic scintigraphy in salivary gland disorders [ J ]. Int J Rad Appl Instrum B,1988,15 (3) :313 -317.
  • 5VITALI C, BOMBARDIERI S, MOUTSOPOULOS HM, et al. Preliminary criteria for the classification of Sjogrenos syndrome. Results of a prospective concerted action supported by the European community [J].Arthritis Rheum, 1993,36 ( 3 ) :340 - 347.
  • 6SAITO T ,FUKUDA H ,HORIKAWA M. et al. Salivary gland seintigraphy with 99mTc-pertechtatc in Sjogrenos syndrome:relationship to clinicopathologic features of salivary and lacrimal glands [ J 1. J oral Pathol Med, 1997,26 ( 1 ) :46 - 50.
  • 7董怡.2002年修订的干燥综合征国际分类(诊断)标准.中华风湿病学杂志,2002,6(4):257-257.
  • 8Takagi Y, Sumi Misa, Sumi T, et al. Mr microscopy of the parotid glands in patients with Sjogren's syndrome: quantitative Mr diagnostic criteria. Am J Neuroradiol, 2005, 26(5): 1207- 1214.
  • 9Sumi M, Takagi Y, Uetani M, et al. Diffusion-weighted echoplanar Mr imaging of the salivary glands. Am J Roentgenol, 2002, 178(4): 959-965.
  • 10Habermann CR, Gossrau P, Graessner J, et al. Diffusion- weighted echo-planar MRI: a valuable tool lbr differentiating primary parotid gland tumors? Rofo, 2005, 177(7): 940-945.

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部