摘要
C IETAC2005年仲裁规则无论在形式上还是实体上都有较大的突破和创新。但是改革仍然不彻底,主要体现在没有完全赋予仲裁庭自裁管辖权、C IETAC对仲裁裁决书草案的审核有干预仲裁庭实体审理之嫌、有关首席仲裁员的确定方式不科学、没有规定涉外仲裁案件中首席仲裁员或独任仲裁员国籍问题以及没有完全打破对仲裁协议书面形式的限制等,同时其在仲裁实践中的一些做法也值得反思。
The new rule makes lots of breakthroughs and innovations both in form and substance. However, the reform is not enough, concerning that the arbitration tribunal has no complete rights on the jurisdiction, is seems that the CIEAC would substantially intervene in the arbitration procedure through examining the draft of the arbitration award, the rule of the selection method of the primary arbitrator is inappropriate, there is no stipulation on the nationality issue of the primary or sole arbitrator in the foreign - related arbitration case and there is no breakthrough on the limits of written form of the arbitration contract. In addition, some of its arbitration practices need rethinking.
出处
《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
北大核心
2006年第3期48-52,共5页
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词
CIETAC
2005仲裁规则
仲裁程序
仲裁庭
创新
CIETAC
2005 arbitration rules
the arbitration procedure
the arbitration tribunal
the arbitrator
