摘要
二战后出现了众多的世界史编撰体系。由于对世界历史的较成熟的认知体系还未产生,这些世界史著述在开创之初都面临如何克服欧洲中心论的问题。许多学者批评欧洲中心论,致力于建立新的世界史,可是仍未获得显著成绩。因为我们的世界史体系是由西方学者建立的,是根据欧洲经验得出的,其中有客观的一面,也有欧洲中心论的一面。非西方国家和地区的史学,是学习西方史学后建立的,缺乏从自己的历史出发建立的理论。现在的世界史只是一种准世界史。
There have been various frameworks for the writing of world history in the post-war period. However, each is faced at the outset with the challenge of Eurocentrism, due to the lack of a well-developed knowledge system about the history of the world. Many authors endeavor to criticize Eurocentrism and make efforts to establish a new world history, but they have achieved little as yet. The reason is that the current framework of world history was established by European researchers based on European experiences. It has an objective aspect but also a Eurocentric aspect. Historiography in non-Western countries and regions is a result of learning from the West, and lacks theories rooted in local history.
出处
《历史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第3期3-22,共20页
Historical Research
