期刊文献+

莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗老年人呼吸道感染疗效比较 被引量:5

Comparative study on moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in treating senile patients with respiratory tract bacterial infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 对照研究莫西沙星与左氧氟沙星治疗老年人呼吸道细菌感染的临床疗效及安全性。方法 将确诊为急性呼吸道感染老年患者86例随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组给予莫西沙星400mg口服,每日1次,对照组给予左氧氟沙星200mg口服,每日2次,疗程7~10天。结果 治疗组的综合疗效高于对照组(P〈0.01);治疗组痊愈率为68.18%,有效率为95.45%。均显著高于时照组的33.33%和76.19%(P〈0.01);治疗组在细菌清除率(93.54%)与药物敏感性(96.77%)方面优于对照组(72.41%和75.86%),差异有境计学意义(P〈0.05);治疗组不良反应为4.55%,对照组为7.14%。结论 莫西沙星具有良好的安全性、耐受性及疗效,是治疗老年人呼吸道感染较为理想的抗菌药物。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in treating respiratory tract bacterial infections in the senile patients. Methods Eighty-six senile patients with respiratory tract bacterial infections were randomly divided into two groups. The clinical trial group with moxifloxacin 400 mg once a day,orally for 7-10 clays and the control group with levofloxacin 200 mg twice a day for 7-10 days. Results The total clinical effective rate in the clinical trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group ( P 〈0.01). The recovery rate of the clinical trial group (68.18%) and the effective rate (95.45 %) were significantly higher than that of the control group (33.33% and 76.19%, P 〈0. 01). The clinical trial group was better than the control group at the eradication rates of pathogens (93.54% and 72.41 %) and sensitivity of drugs (96.77 % and 75.86%), the difference had the statistical significance ( P 〈0.05). The rate of adverse reaction was A. 55 % in the clinical trial group and 7.14 % in the control group, respectively. Conclusion Moxifloxacin is an effective and safe antibacterial drug in treating respiratory tract bacterial infections in the senile patients.
作者 王蕾 梁钢
出处 《临床荟萃》 CAS 北大核心 2006年第12期853-855,共3页 Clinical Focus
关键词 呼吸道感染 老年人 莫西沙星 左氧氟沙星 respiratory tract bacterial infections senility moxifloxacin levofloxacin
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献10

  • 1BallP.Fluoroquinolonesafetyandtolerability[].Proceedingoffirstinternationalmoxifloxacinsymposium.1999
  • 2Souli M,Wennersten CB,Eliopoulous GM.In vitro activity of BAY 128039, a new fluoroquinolone, against species representative of respiratory tract pathogens[].International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents.1998
  • 3Bradford WZ,Daley CL.Multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis[].Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice.1998
  • 4Aldridge KE,Ashcraft DS.Comparison of the in vitro activities of BAY 12-8039, a new quinolone, and other antimicrobials against clinically important anaerobes[].Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.1997
  • 5Fass RJ.In vitro activity of Bay 12-8039, a new 8-methoxyquinolone[].Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.1997
  • 6Visalli MA,Jacobs MR,Appelbaum PC.Antipneumococcal activity of BAY 12-8039, a new quinolone, compared with activities of three other quinolones and four oral beta-lactams[].Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.1997
  • 7Stass HH,Kubitza D.Study to evaluate the interaction between moxifloxacin ( M ) and iron supplements ( FE )[].Antiinfect Drug Chemother.1998
  • 8Klugman KP,Capper T.Concentration-dependent killing of antibioticresistant pneumococci by the methoxyquinolone moxifloxacin[].Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.1997
  • 9Woodcock JM,Andrews JM,Boswell JF,et al.In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a new fluoroquinolone[].Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.1997
  • 10Wise R.A review of the clinical pharmacology of moxifloxacin , a new 8methoxyquinolone, and its potential relation to therapeutic efficacy[].Clin Drug Inves.1999

共引文献103

同被引文献63

引证文献5

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部