期刊文献+

3国不同粉尘采样器测定结果的比较 被引量:2

Comparison of Different Sampling Methods for Determining Dust Concentration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]比较研究3国不同粉尘采样器的测定结果。[方法]采用中国、美国和德国总尘和呼尘采样器在武昌造船厂的清铲和造型车间于呼吸带高度进行平行采样8d,并测定总尘、呼尘浓度。[结果]中国、美国、德国的总尘和呼尘采样器的测定结果具有一定的相关性(P<0.05)。但中国总尘采样器的测定结果与美国、德国的结果有差异(P<0.05);而呼尘间无差异(P>0.05)。[结论]我国呼尘采样测定结果与国外采样器测定结果具有可比性。 [ Objective ] Comparative studies on the dust concentration with different sampling methods. [ Methods ] We determined the dust contention in the Wuchang shipyard for 8 days with different sampling instruments, i.e. total dust and respirable dust samplers from China, Germany and USA. All the samplers were located in the workplace at a height of respiratory zone, to make a parallel sampling. [ Results ] Using the samplers from China/Germany/USA, there was correlation between the result of total dust and that of respirable dust. There was significiant difference in the results of total dust between the Chinese instruments and German or USA instruments( P 〈 0.05 ), but no significant difference among the results of respirable dust sampled by threes kinds of samplers ( P 〉 0.05 ). [ Conclution ] The results of respirable dust suggested that Chinese instrument was comparable with Germany and USA instruments.
出处 《环境与职业医学》 CAS 北大核心 2006年第3期253-254,258,共3页 Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
关键词 总尘 呼尘 采样方法 测定结果 可比性 total dust respirable dust sampling method detemining result feasiblity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Dirk Dahmann,杨磊,王正伦.粉尘测定的采样方法及其结果的可比性[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2003,21(4):297-298. 被引量:12
  • 2Dahmann D, Plitzko S, Yang L, et al. Comparison of sampling instruments using DIN EN 13205 [J]. Gefahrstoffe-Reinhaltung der Luft, 2004, 64: 345-352.
  • 3Dahmann D, Hartfiel GD, Jackisch J.Intercomparision and performance of stationary aerosol samplers [J].Gefahrstoffe-Reinhal tung der Luft, 2001, 61: 201-206.
  • 4Comer P, Wrobel R, Miotka V, et al. Study of fifteen respirable aerosol samplers used in occupational hygiene [J].Ann Occup Hyg, 2001, 45: 243-254.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. MAK-und BAT-Werte-Liste. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2001.155-163.
  • 2Workplace atomospheres-Size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne particle. EN 481.1993.
  • 3Festlegung von Partikelgroeβenverteilungen zur Messung luftgertragener Partikel. DIN/ISO 7708.1996.
  • 4Orenstein AJ, Churchill Ed. Proceedings of the Pneumoconiosis Conference, Johannesburg 1959. London: J and A Ltd, 1960.
  • 5Dahmann D, Hartfiel GD, Jackisch J. Intercomparison and performance of stationary aerosol samplers, Gefahrstoffe-Reinhaltung der luft,2001,61 :201-206.
  • 6Gorner P, Wrobel R,Mioka V,et al. Study of fifteen respirable aerosol samplers used in occupational hygiene. Ann Occup Hyg, 2001,45 : 43-54.
  • 7Bauer HD, Dahmann D, Stoyke G. Vergleichsmessungen zwischen konimetrie und gravimetrischer Feinstaubprobenahme in Uranerdagersta tten von Sachsen und Thüringen, Gefahrstoffe-Reinhaltung der Luft, 1998,58:153-160.
  • 8B oclder-Klusemann M,Armbruster L, Neulinger G,et al. Meesungen in Gieβerein-Einsatz von direktanzeigenden, kontinuierlichen Meβsystemen zur Bestimmung der Feinstaubkonzentration von silikogenen Stauben.Staub-Reinhaltung der Luft, 1992,52 : 273-277.
  • 9Armbruster L, Bauer HD, Hesse F. Untersuchungen zum Umrechnungsverb altnis zwischen gemessenen Gesamt- und Feinstaubkonzentration bei silikogenen Grubenstauben im Steinkohlenbergbau. Kompaβ, 1993, 103 :287-292.

共引文献11

同被引文献32

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部