摘要
构成要件理论的提出为大陆法系三阶层的犯罪论体系奠定了坚实的基础,但是在刑法学中关于构成要件性质的论争却一直没有停止过,构成要件的违法行为类型说以及违法.有责(行为)类型说一直居于中心地位,但是在上世纪70年代的日本刑法学中出现了复兴贝林的构成要件理论的行为类型说,这个学说试图重新确立构成要件在犯罪论体系中的独立地位以实现其罪刑法定原则的机能。
The theory of constructive factors laid a solid foundation for Continental Legal Family＇s criminology system, while much controversy has been raised on the nature of constructive factors. The doctrine of illegal activities patterns for constructive factors and the doctrine of illegal and liable activities patterns are in the centre. In Japan, Beling＇s doctrine of activity pattern in constructive factors was revived in the 1970s; this doctrine tries to reestablish the independent status of constructive factors in criminology system and to realize its function of decide crime and punishment under law.
出处
《当代法学》
北大核心
2006年第4期137-142,共6页
Contemporary Law Review
关键词
构成要件
行为类型说
罪刑法定原则
constructive factors
doctrine of activity pattern
principle of crime and punishment under law
