期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

综合环境评价理念在空气污染健康影响评价中的应用及特点 被引量：1

Characteristics Analysis of Existing Integrated Environmental Assessments on Air Pollution-Induced Health Effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,有关空气污染健康影响综合评价的研究框架可归纳为4种类型,即:美国环境保护局研究框架、美国哈佛大学研究框架、泰国研究框架和中国研究框架。综合环境评价的目的是为实现可持续发展提供科学决策依据,基于这一宗旨,该文对此4类研究框架的特点进行了系统性的比较和分析,指出各自的优点及局限性,并对进一步完善综合评价空气污染健康影响的研究提出了建议。 The existing frameworks of integrated assessment on air pollution-induced health effects can be classified into four types, i.e.U.S. EPA framework, U.S. Harvard University framework, Thailand framework and China framework. As the intention of integrated environmental assessment is to provide a scientific warranty for sustainable development-related policymaking process, the authors made a systematic review for the four types of integrated assessment framework. Not only the strong points and disadvantages in each type of framework were analyzed in detail, but also suggestions for future improvement in integrated assessment were put forward.
作者 宛悦 杨宏伟 增井利彦
机构地区 北京市疾病预防控制中心 国家发展改革委员会能源研究所 日本国立环境研究所
出处 《环境与健康杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期376-379,共4页 Journal of Environment and Health
基金 日本国内环境研究所国际合作项目。
关键词 空气污染 环境评价 健康效应 Air pollution Environment assessment, Health effect
分类号 R122.2 [医药卫生—环境卫生学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1杨宏伟,周大地.论全面建设小康社会的环境目标及其对能源发展的要求[J].环境保护,2005,33(4):68-72. 被引量：4
  • 2中国人口信息研究中心.人口与计划生育常用数据手册,2001[M].北京:国家计划生育委员会,2001:5-100.
  • 3Unite Nations.World population prospects:the 2000 revision[M].Population Division,Department of Economic and Social Affairs,Unite Nations.
  • 4中华人民共和国国家统计局..中国统计年鉴-2004[OL]..http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/yb2004-c/indexch.htm,,2006-01-06..
  • 5Bruce JP,Lee H,Haites EF.Climate change 1995:economics and social dimensions of climate change[M].USA.New York:Cambridge University Press,1996:371.
  • 6Rotmans J.Image:an integrated model to assess the greenhouse effect[M].Dordrecht,The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1990:6-20.
  • 7Nordhaus WD.To slow or not to slow:the economics of the greenhouse effect[J].The Economic Journal,1991,101:920-937.
  • 8Edmonds JA,Wise M,MacCracken C.Advanced energy technologies and climate change:an analysis using the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM)[M].Washington DC:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,1994:5-20.
  • 9Downing RJ,Ramnnkutty R,Shah JJ.RAINS-ASIA:an assessment model for acid deposition in Asia[M].Washington DC.USA:World Bank,1997:5-20.
  • 10Kainuma M,Matsuoka Y,Morita T.Climate policy assessment:Asia-Pacific integrated modeling[M].Tokyo:Springer-Verlag,2003:5-20.

二级参考文献32

  • 1Cragg, W., Bartlett, S., Grondin, J., Band, P., Camus, M., Guerrier, P., Québec, S., Chevalier, P., Banken, R., Bickis, U., and Webster, A. (1999). Canadian handbook on health impact assessment, volume 3: roles for the health practitioner, draft. Health Canada's Office of Environmental Health Assessment, Canada.
  • 2World Health Organization (2000). Consideration in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of environmental health interventions.
  • 3Landefield, J. S. and Seskin, E. P. (1982). The economic value of life: linking theory to practice. Am. J. Public Health 72(6), 555-566.
  • 4Olsen, J. A., Smith, R. D., and Harris, A. (1999). Economic theory and the monetary valuation of health care: an overview of the issues as applied to the economic evaluation of health care programs. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Australia.
  • 5Alberini, A., Krupnick, A., Cropper, M., Simon, M., and Cook, J. (2001). The willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a comparison of the United States and Canada. Research report.
  • 6Krupnick, A., Alberini, A., Cropper, M., Simon, N., O'Brien, B., Goeree, R., and Heintzelman, M. (2002). Age, health, and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24(2), 161-186.
  • 7Smith, V. K., Evans, M. F., Kim, H., and Taylor, D. H. (2003). Do the 'Near' elderly value mortality risks differently? Research report.
  • 8Li, W. and Zhao, Y. K. (1995). Friction cost method-measures of indirect cost of illness. Foreign Medical Sciences: Section of Medical Economics 13(13), 134-135. (In Chinese)
  • 9Hutubessy, R. C., van Tulder, M. W., Vondeling, H., and Bouter, L. M. (1999). Indirect costs of back pain in the Netherlands: a comparison of the human capital method with the friction cost method. Pain 80(1-2), 201-207.
  • 10Andersson, A., Levin, L. A., and Emtinger, B. G. (2002). The economic burden of informal care. Int. Journal of Technol. Assess. Health 18(1), 46-54.

共引文献4

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

环境与健康杂志
2006年 第4期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部