期刊文献+

胰岛素强化治疗对严重创伤患者CD14^+单核细胞比率及人白细胞抗原-DR表达的影响 被引量:6

Influence of intensive insulin therapy on rate of CD14^+ and expression of CD14^+ monocyte human leukocyte antigen DR in severe trauma patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过胰岛素强化治疗对严重创伤患者CD14+单核细胞比率及CD14+单核细胞人白细胞抗原-DR(HLA-DR)表达的影响,探讨强化治疗在严重创伤后的抗炎与免疫调节作用的效果和临床价值。方法采用随机配对分组的研究方法,对外科ICU收治的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)>20分的严重创伤患者分别给予胰岛素强化治疗(血糖目标值6~8mmol/L)和常规治疗(血糖目标值<11.1 mmol/L)。分别在入院后0、2、4、6、8 d留取外周静脉血,采用流式细胞技术检测CD14+单核细胞HLA-DR表达率。结果胰岛素强化治疗组随着强化治疗时间增加,CD14+单核细胞HLA-DR表达下降,具有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01);与常规治疗组相比较,胰岛素强化治疗在不同时间点对CD14+单核细胞比率无明显影响(P>0.05)。结论胰岛素强化治疗在控制创伤后应激性血糖升高的同时,保护了伤后脏器功能,增强天然免疫防御反应的同时,也有诱导创伤后免疫抑制的风险。在严重创伤早期实施有选择性和适度的胰岛素强化治疗对危重患者更为可取。 Objective To study the influence of intensive insulin therapy on rate of CD14^+ monocyt and expression of CD14^+ monocyt human leukocyte antigen DR ( HLA - DR) in severe trauma patients, and to investigate the role of protection to serious illness. Methods Insulin therapy directed at establishing euglycemia was investigated in 32 sICU injured patients ISS〉20, tailored to control blood glucose levels in the range 6- 8 mmol/L, where as the conventional treatment group only received insulin when glucose levels exceeded 11.1 mmol/L. Blood samples were obtained at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 days after admission. Two - color flow cytometric {FCM) analysis was used for the detection of the human leukocyte antigen HLA- DR expression on CD14^+ monocytes. Results Monocyte HLA- DR expressions were comparatively lower after using of insulin protocols, compared with the conventional approach. Conclusions Intensive insulin therapy improves blood glucose control and protects organ functions in injured patients. Attenuating the systemic inflammatory response to trauma, as well as its glycemia controlling effects, may contribute to the improved outcomes of sever trauma patients.
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第7期481-484,共4页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(973项目 No.2005-CB522602) 国家杰出青年基金项目(No.30125020) 首都医学发展基金重点项目(No.2003-2023)
关键词 严重创伤 胰岛素强化治疗 人白细胞抗原-DR 免疫功能 Severe trauma Intensive insulin therapy Human leukocyte antigen DR Immune function
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Hoffer LJ. Protein and energy provision in critical illness[J] .Am J Clin Nutri, 2003,78(5):906-911.
  • 2Chiolero R, Revelly JP, Tappy L.Energy metabolism in sepsis and injury[J]. Nutrition, 1997, 13(Suppl): 45S-51S.
  • 3Core DC, Chinkes D, Heggers J, et al. Association of hyperglycemia with increased mortality after severe bum injury[J]. J Trauma, 2001, 51(3) :540-544.
  • 4Bochicchio GV, Sung J, Joshi M, et al. Persistent hyperglycemia is predictive of outcome in critically ill trauma patients [J]. J Trauma,2005, 58: 921-924.
  • 5Teixeira AS, Andrade SP. Glucose - induced inhibition of angiogenesis in the rat sponge granuloma is prevented by aminoguanidine [J]. Life Sci,1999, 64(8) :655 - 662.
  • 6Black CT, Hennessey PJ, Andrassy PJ, et al. Short - term hyperglycemia depresses immunity through nonenzymatic glycosylation of circulating immunoglobulin[J]. J Trauma, 1990, 30:830- 833.
  • 7Yoshida S . Monocyte HLA - DR expression as predictors of clinical outcome for patients with sepsis [J]. Nippon Rinsho, 2004, 62(12) :2281 - 2284.
  • 8Heinzelmann M, Mercer- Jones M, Cheadle WG, et al. CD14 expression in injured patients correlates with outcome[J]. Ann Surg, 1996, 224:91-96.
  • 9Ditschkowski M , Kreuzfelder E , Rebmann V , et al . HLA - DR expression and soluble HLA- DR levels in septic patients after trauma[J]. Ann Surg, 1999, 229(2):246- 254.
  • 10虞文魁,李维勤,王晓东,燕晓雯,祁晓平,李宁,黎介寿.胰岛素严格控制血糖对脓毒症患者的影响及其机理的初步探讨[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(1):29-32. 被引量:47

二级参考文献9

  • 1Dellinger RP, Carlet JIM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Management Guidelines Committee. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med, 2004, 32:858-873.
  • 2Tsai MH, Peng YS, Lien JM, et al. Multiple organ system failure in critically Ill cirrhotic patients. A comparison of two multiple organ dysfunction/failure scoring systems. Digestion, 2004, 69:190-200.
  • 3Das UN. Insulin and the critically ill. Crit Care, 2002, 6:262-263.
  • 4Hansen TK, Thiel S, Wouters PJ, et al. Intensive insulin therapy exerts antiinflammatory effects in critically ill patients and counteracts the adverse effect of low mannose-binding lectin levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2003,88:1082-1088.
  • 5Yu WK, Li WQ, Li N, et al. Mononuclear histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-DR expression in the early phase of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology, 2004, 27,4:233-243.
  • 6Tschaikowsky K, Hedwig-Geissing M, Schiele A, et al. Coincidence of pro- and anti-inflammatory responses in the early phase of severe sepsis: longitudinal study of mononuclear histocompathtibility leukocyte antigen-DR expression, procalctonin, C-reactive protein, and changes in T-cell subsets in septic and postoperative patients. Crit Care Med, 2002,30:1015-1023.
  • 7van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F,et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill. N Engl J Med, 2001, 345:1359-1367.
  • 8Netea MG, van der Meer JW, Kullberg BJ. Sepsis-theory and therapies. N Engl J Med, 2003, 348:1600-1602.
  • 9American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis.Crit Care Med, 1992,20:864-874.

共引文献46

同被引文献64

引证文献6

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部