期刊文献+

我国刑事二审审理方式修正浅论 被引量:3

A Brief Study of Amendment of Ways of Second Trial
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国刑事诉讼实行二审终审,二审对纠正一审程序事实和法律方面的错误,确保准确及时地惩罚犯罪、保护无辜,均具有十分重要的意义。但是在二审的审理方式上,我国司法实践中大多数情况下都是采用不开庭的形式进行,这种现状极大地阻碍了刑事诉讼实体公正与程序公正之实现。二审开庭审理是世界上许多国家和地区的普遍做法,鉴于我国刑事二审审理方式之弊端,笔者建议在修订刑事诉讼法时,应当规定无论是对检察机关抗诉的案件还是当事人方的上诉案件,二审都应当开庭公开审理。 Second trial in China is significant in correcting errors in first trial and punishing criminals and protecting the innocent. But the second trial without sitting severely desecrated justice. A sitting second trial is widely adopted in the world. In view of these wrong doings, the writer suggests that a sitting second trial should be legalized and practiced in routine cases.
作者 王桂芳
出处 《中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期118-122,共5页 Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 二审 审理方式 开庭审理 审判公开 second trial a sitting trial ways of inquisition
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1樊崇义.刑事诉讼法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.179-180.
  • 2陈瑞华.程序正义的理论基础——评马修的“尊严价值理论”[J].中国法学,2000(3):144-152. 被引量:172
  • 3卞建林.外国刑事诉讼法[M].北京:人民法院出版社,中国社会科学出版社,2006:216-218.
  • 4赵海峰.法国刑事诉讼法重大改革评价[M]//赵海峰,卢建平.欧洲法通讯:第二辑.北京:法律出版社,2001:189 192.
  • 5卡斯东·斯特法尼.法国刑事诉讼法精义[M].罗结珍,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999:833.
  • 6陈光中.外国刑事诉讼程序比较研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1998.104-140.

二级参考文献12

  • 1约翰·罗尔斯著 何怀宏等译.《正义论》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1988年版.第3、7—8、56页.
  • 2Jerry L. Mashaw,Administrative Due Prooess the Quest for a Dignitary Theory, in Boron Universiry Law Reres, Vol.61,1981.
  • 3Jerry L. Mashaw,Due Prooess in the Administrative State,1985 by Yale University Press.
  • 4R. Saphire, Specifying Due Process Values:Towards a More Responsive Approach To Prccedural Protection,in University of Pesylvanis Law Review, Vol, 127,1978.
  • 5Stewart,The Reformation of American Administrative Law,88Harvard Law Review,1975.
  • 6Robert S. Summers,Evaluating and Improving Legal Process-A Plea for "Process Value", in Cornell Law Review,Vol. 61,1981., pp. 885 - 931.
  • 7Gerald J. Postema, the Principle of Utility and the Law of Procedure: Bentham's Theory of Adjudication, in Georgia Law Review, Vol. 11.1977.
  • 8E. Pincoffs, due Proeess, Fraternity, and a Kantian Injunction,in Due Process,Pennock and Chapman ( eds. ) ,pp.172-181.
  • 9E. Pincoffs,Due Process,Fraternity,and a Kantian Injunction,in due Process,Pennock and Chapman(eds.) ,pp. 172 -181.
  • 10Jerry L. Mashaw, Administrative Due Process: the Puest for a Dignitary Theory, in Boston University Law Review, Vol.61,1981.

共引文献200

同被引文献18

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部