摘要
伴随中国物权法与民法典的制定,海峡两岸对物权法定原则质疑日渐增多,这促使我们重新审视物权法定的一些理论问题。本文运用经济分析方法,从信息成本外部化与挫折成本这两个方面探讨物权法定以及物权自由的成本—效益问题。由此得出结论:物权法定的挫折成本主要源自法律对物权、债权的不同救济方式,而物权自由的信息成本外部化则是局部性的。因此,在规范上,推翻物权法定不是降低挫折成本的唯一途径,而信息成本外部化也不必然要求否定物权自由。
Numerus clausus refers to the principle that both the form and the substance of a property right shall be prescribed by the law, which essentially restricts the freedom to ＂customize＂ the legally enforceable property interests.2 It has long been regarded as a basic principle in Civil Law countries, while the recent studies of U.S. scholars suggest that its essence exists in the Anglo-American law as well.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第4期129-140,共12页
Social Sciences in China
