期刊文献+

批判性思维概念的理论探讨 被引量:12

Theoretic Research About the Conception of Critical Thinking
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过对文献资料的收集、整理,较全面地了解批判性思维概念的内涵。方法选择不同时期、不同教科书、不同社团组织具有代表性的对批判性思维的定义及逻辑学大辞典对批判性思维(CT)的定义,进行比较、分析、归纳和整合。结果根据逻辑学定义的基本方法——种差加临近属概念,尝试从发生、操作、功用性等方面给出批判性思维的定义。结论批判性思维是发生在人们听、说、读、写等人际沟通以及从事的各类社会实践活动中;通过学习并运用哲学、心理学、逻辑学、系统科学、社会科学等人文社会知识和相关专业的自然科学知识,主动从多角色、多层面、多时间段进行反省性思考、调查与论证,实事求是地进行合情合理的评估、判断与决定,目的明确地提出问题和解决问题;最终促进事物有序的发生、发展,利于个人心智健康的成长、成熟,推动社会和谐的发展与进步的科学思维方法。 Objective The intension of conception about critical thinking will be rather roundly understood through collection and coordination of literature data. Methods The some representative definitions of critical thinking were choose from differ days, differ textbooks, differ offices of institutional research and logic thesaurus for comparing, analyzing, inducing, conforming. Results Based on essence method of logic definition, that is specific difference and near concept of genus, critical thinking may be defined on genetic, operational and functional definition. Conclusion Critical thinking could occur during listening, speaking, reading and writing of interpersonal communication and every activity of social practice. It is necessary that philosophy, psychology, logic, systemic science, social science of humanities and correlation natural science should be studied and exercised. It is a process of self - reflection thinking actively on differ role, multilevel, more time, research and argument, realistic fair and reasonable evaluation, estimation and decision, defining and solving question. Finally, it is a thinking method of science for promoting orderly formation and development of thing, profiting individual shape and mature of thinker, impelling harmonious development and progress of community.
出处 《国际护理学杂志》 2006年第8期601-603,共3页 international journal of nursing
基金 安徽省高校省级教学研究项目基金资助 项目编号:2005188
关键词 批判性思维 技能 心智倾向 Critical thinking Skills Thinker disposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Hye-Kyung K. Critical Thinking, Learning and Confucius: A Positive Assessment. J Philosophy Education, 2003, 37 (1) : 71 -87.
  • 2Schwarz MR, Wojtczak A. Global minimum essential requirements: a road to. wards competence-oriented medical education. Med Teach. 2002,24: 125-129.
  • 3胡爱萍,夏强.全球医学教育最基本要求及其推广的相关问题和对策[J].中国高等医学教育,2005(2):6-7. 被引量:41
  • 4陈燕华,朱丹.中美护理本科专业课程设置的比较研究[J].护理研究,2005,19(3):452-455. 被引量:18
  • 5武宏志.论批判性思维[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2004,3(11):10-16. 被引量:180
  • 6武宏志.何谓“批判性思维”?[J].青海师专学报,2004,24(4):1-4. 被引量:59
  • 7Ermis RH. A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership. 1989, (4) : 4 -10.
  • 8Halpem DF. Teaching critical thinking across - domain: dispositions, skills, structure, and meta - cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 1998, (4): 450.
  • 9Paul R. Teaching critical thinking in the strong'sense. A focus on self -deception, coordinating views and a dialectical mode of analysis. Informed Logic Newsletter, 1982, (4) : 2 -7.
  • 10Simpson E, Courtney M. Critical thinking in nursing education: Literature review. Int J Nuts Practice, 2002, (8) : 89 -98.

二级参考文献50

  • 1郭贵春.“科学修辞学转向”及其意义[J].自然辩证法研究,1994,10(12):13-19. 被引量:14
  • 2王正伦,张文清,刘春艳,王兴民.高等护理学专业课程设置的比较与分析[J].中国高等医学教育,1995(3):18-23. 被引量:10
  • 3[1]Gardner Lindzey. et al, Psychology. 2/e. New York :Worth Publishers. 1978. PP. 309-318.
  • 4[2]Richard Paul. ‘Critical Thinking: Basic Questions and Answers ' http ://www. sonoma.edu/cthink/
  • 5[3]Richard Paul. ‘Why student and Teachers Don't Reason Well ' http://www. sonoma. edu/cthink/
  • 6[4]David Hitchcock. ‘Do the Fallacies Have a Place in the Teaching of Reasoning Skills or critical Thinking?' in Fallacies:Classical and contemporary rdadings. Hanson and Robert CPinto. eds.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 1995. pp. 320-321.
  • 7[5]Joel Rudinow. Invitation to critical thinking. 4/e.Orlando :Vincent Ebarry Harcourt Brace CollegePublishers. 1999. pp. 6-9.
  • 8[6]J. Anthony Blair. 'The Place of Teaching Informal Fallacies in Teaching Reasoning Skills or Critical Thinking'. in Fallacies: Classcal and contemporary rdadings. Hans V. Hanson and Robert C. Pinto. eds. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 1995. pp. 328-330.
  • 9[7]Richard Paul and Linda Elder. 'Helping Students Assess Their Thinking'. http://www. sonoma. edu/cthink/
  • 10[8]John Chaffee. Thinking Critically. 2/e. Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company. 1988. pp. 27-63.

共引文献304

同被引文献110

引证文献12

二级引证文献119

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部