期刊文献+

AHP模型对不同苜蓿价值的综合评定与应用 被引量:7

Application of analytic hierarchy process in comprehensive assessment of economic value of alfalfa varieties
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用AHP法对31个苜蓿Medicago sativa品种品质性状进行综合评价,构造递阶层次结构和两两比较判断矩阵,通过层次单排序、层次总排序和一致性检验,求得准则层2个元素(饲用价值和生产价值)的排序权值各占0.5,因素层5个元素(营养成分、适口性、消化率、产草量和再生速度)的排序权值分别为0.319、0.129、0.052、0.334、0.169和11个品质性状的排序全向量。通过综合评分,求得31个苜蓿品种经济价值的综合评价序位,前5位为北疆苜蓿、牧歌401、爱菲尼特、全能和巨人201。最后通过层次分析法(AHP)与灰色关联度法对31个苜蓿品种经济价值的综合评价相比较,结果证明所得结果均具有可靠性,而AHP法更为合理准确。 This study applied Analytic Hierarchy Process to comprehensive assessment of the economic characteristics of 31 alfalfa varieties. The results were as follows: weighting values of feeding value and productive value were 0. 5 each, those of nutrient, palatability, DOM digestibility, hay yield and rate of regeneration were 0. 319, 0. 129, O. 052, 0. 334, 0. 169. By comprehensive assessment, Beijing, Amerigraze401, Affinity, Total and Ameristand201 had the highest score of 31 alfalfa varieties. Finally, we compared the results of comprehensive assessment respectively by Analytic Hierarchy Process and by grey relation degree. It showed that both had high reliability, and Analytic Hierarchy Process was more reasonable.
出处 《草业科学》 CAS CSCD 2006年第8期33-39,共7页 Pratacultural Science
基金 农业部"948"项目"高产优质抗逆苜蓿新品种的引进及繁育"(2001-372) 教育部重点项目"农牧交错区草业助推技术体系研究"(重点01167) 农业部农业结构调整重大技术研究专项项目(2002-09-02A) 陕西省科技厅攻关项目"陕北黄土高原丘陵沟壑区退耕种草综合技术体系研究"(2001K01-J12-04)
关键词 苜蓿 AHP法 灰色关联度法 经济价值 综合评价 alfalfa analytic hierarchy process grey relation degree economic value compressive assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1王德利,祝廷成.牧草价值综合评价的定量方法探讨[J].草业学报,1993,2(1):33-38. 被引量:22
  • 2许令妊.内蒙古草原地带主要植物的饲用评价[A].内蒙古农牧学院科学研究报告集[C].呼和浩特:内蒙古农牧学院出版社,1962.
  • 3宁布.论野生牧草的饲用评价[J].中国草地,1987,(3):64-67.
  • 4WinterKA.评价牧草消化率的纤维素指数法[J].国外畜牧学:草原与牧草,1988,(3):30-30.
  • 5Abrams S M. Relationship of forage-evaluation techniques to the intake and digestibility of tropical grasses[A]. Proceedings of the ⅩⅣth I. G. C. [C]. Lexington, KY, USA: Westview Press, 1981. 508-510 .
  • 6Minson D J. Forage quality: assessing the plant-animal complex[A]. Proceedings of the ⅩⅣth I. G. C[C] . Lexington, KY, USA: Westview Press,1981.23-28.
  • 7Marble V L,Templeton W C. Development of a national alfalfa quality assessment procedure in the United States[A]. Proceedings of the ⅩⅣth I. G. C[C]. Lexington, KY, USA:Westview Press,1985. 963-964.
  • 8Baltensperger D D. Harvesting alycecolver for maximum dry matter yield and nutrient value[A]. Proceedings of the ⅩⅣth I. G. C [C]. Lexington, KY,USA:Westview Press, 1985. 945-946.
  • 9张喜军,祝廷成,潘伟.牧草饲用价值综合评价的数学模型[J].中国草地,1991,13(6):63-67. 被引量:67
  • 10夏明,桂荣,那日苏.牧草营养成分聚类分析与评价[J].中国草地,2000,22(4):33-37. 被引量:28

二级参考文献6

  • 1章祖同.草场资源评价方法的探讨[J].资源科学,1981,11(3):13-18. 被引量:18
  • 2阳含熙,植物生态学的数量分类方法,1983年,327页
  • 3宁布.论野生牧草的饲用评价[J]中国草原,1988(03).
  • 4王昱生,潘介正.草场资源综合评价的数学模型[J]植物生态学与地植物学丛刊,1985(03).
  • 5刘德福,赵利利.关于天然草场等级评价方案的商讨[J]中国草原,1983(02).
  • 6朱兴运.绵羊采食量和消化率测定方法简况(综述)[J]四川草原,1983(01).

共引文献146

同被引文献97

引证文献7

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部