摘要
国际关系学科诞生伊始,规范理论占据主导地位,经过学科史上前两次的争论,规范理论渐趋式微,国际关系和政治理论成为两个完全独立的研究领域。冷战结束前后,国际关系理论发展的多元化成为本学科的一个重要特点,与后实证主义中的其他非主流理论一道,规范理论对以新现实主义和新自由主义为代表的主流理论发起有力的挑战。当代大部分规范理论主要围绕世界主义和社群主义这两种政治哲学的争论而展开,争论的核心问题在于道德价值的载体究竟是个人还是国家共同体。对于世界主义和社群主义在价值取向方面的分歧很难有一个简单的答案,但在全球化时代,国际关系规范理论必将引起人们越来越多的重视。
Normative theory was dominant when the discipline of IR was established. Initially, especially in the second debate of the discipline, normative theory declined, and political theory and international relations became two independent fields. Around the end of the Cold War, there was a pluralization in the development of IR theories. Along with other non-mainstream post-positivism theories, normative theory posed a great challenge to the mainstream theories led by neo-liberalism and neo-realism. The main debate of normative theory concerned the cosmopolitanism/communitarianism divide, with the core issue being whether individuals or political communities are the carriers of moral values. There is no simple answer to this question; nevertheless, during the age of globalization normative theory is bound to attract more attention.
出处
《世界经济与政治》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第8期49-56,共8页
World Economics and Politics
