摘要
我国刑事诉讼实行以务必发现事实真相为基本主张的实质(客观)真实发现主义,近年来此一主义受到挑战。本文比较了实质真实发现主义与形式真实发现主义、积极的实质真实发现主义与消极的实质真实发现主义的差异,分析了实质真实发现主义与诉讼类型、诉讼模式的关系,指出实质真实发现主义是职权主义刑事诉讼的构成要素,它与职权主义有着共同的理性主义的认识论基础。作者反对在刑事诉讼中弃置实质真实发现主义,同时主张将我国实际实行的积极的实质真实发现主义转移为消极的实质真实发现主义,将审判活动的重心转移到防止给无辜者定罪上来。
Summary To find out substantial truth is a fundamental principle and be carded out in criminal procedure of China. It is challenged now by several scholars that it is necessary and possible to find out substantial troth. This dissertation compares substantial tmthism and formal tmthism, positive substantial tmthism and passive substantial tmthism, analyses the relation between substantial tmthism and procedural styles, procedural models. Substantial tmthism is a important factor of litigation system, and have the same base of rationalism as litigation system. The author do not support the viewpoint of being to give up substantial tmthism and assert to shift positive substantial tmthism to passive substantial 1 tmthism in order to avoid convicting innocent persons.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第4期169-179,共11页
China Legal Science
