摘要
目的观察国产C-L短柱侧倾碟瓣主动脉瓣置换术后中期血流动力学的表现,并评价其功能。方法选择20例单纯主动脉瓣置换术后>5年的患者分为2组,C-L短柱侧倾碟瓣组:采用C-L短柱侧倾碟瓣(21mm)行主动脉瓣置换术;M edtron ic-H a ll组:采用M edtron ic-H a ll侧倾碟瓣(21mm)行主动脉瓣置换术,每组10例。比较两组静息状态下的最大跨瓣压差(ΔP)、平均跨瓣压差(ΔPm)和瓣膜有效开口面积(EOA)。结果在静息状态下,C-L短柱侧倾碟瓣组和M edtron ic-H a ll组的ΔP分别为11.63±3.23mmHg(1kPa=7.5mmHg)和9.78±3.35mmHg,ΔPm分别为6.25±2.32mmHg和5.85±2.32mmHg,EOA分别为1.07±0.17cm2和1.25±0.27 cm2,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论主动脉瓣置换术后中期血流动力学检测结果显示,C-L短柱侧倾碟瓣与M edtron ic-H a ll侧倾碟瓣的血流动力学结果相似,其功能良好,是一个可靠的心脏瓣膜。
Objective To observe the midterm haemodynamic manifestation of the home made C-L pugestrut tilting disc mechanical valve in aortic valve replacement, and to evaluate its function. Methods Twenty patients underwent aortic valve replacement over 5 years were collected and divided into two groups, the C-L pugestrut group （n=10）：aortic valve was replaced by home-made C-L pugestrut tilting disc mechanical valve（21mm）; Medtronic-Hall group （n=10）：aortic valve was replaced by Medtronic-Hall mechanical valve （21mm）. The peak transprosthetic gradients （△P）, mean transprosthetic gradients （△Pm）and effective orifice area（EOA） at rest were compared between two groups. Results At rest, △P of the C-L pugestrut group and Medtronic-Hall group were 11.63±3.23mmHg vs. 9. 78±3. 35mmHg; △Pm of the C-L pugestrut group and Medtronic-Hall group were 6. 25±2. 32 mmHg vs. 5.85±2.32mmHg： EOA of the C-L pugestrut group and Medtronic-Hall group were 1.07±0.17 cm^2 vs. 1.25±0.27 cm^2. There was no statistically significance in △P, △Pm and EOA between two groups（P〉0.05）. Conclusions The midterm haemodynamic results of the home-made C-L pugestrut tilting disc mechanical valve show that it has comparable haemodynamic results to those of Medtronic-Hall mechanical valve ,and it has well-done function. The home-made C-L pugestrut valve is one of the reliable mechanical heart valves.
出处
《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》
CAS
2006年第4期218-220,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
