摘要
假释的性质历来众说纷纭。从应然的角度,对假释的认识应从“国家对罪犯施舍的恩惠”逐渐演变成“罪犯的权利”。假释可以分为任意假释和强制假释两种,其适用比率在行刑中可以提升,适用对象也应扩大到被判死缓、无期徒刑和有期徒刑的犯罪分子。但是,对于被判死缓和无期徒刑的犯罪分子,应明确只有被减刑为有期徒刑时,才取得假释请求权,这应作为任意假释的前置条件。罪犯符合法定条件时,应当被强制假释。假释的考验期应重新规制,以适应行刑实践。
There are different opinions about the nature of parole from beginning. If we take an actual review from the rule that it should be, we should make an alternation that the parole is not the government＇s giving to the convicts, but the right of the convicts. Parole can be divided into two forms： the compulsory and incompulsory. We could increase the ratio of parole application and enlarge its scope to the convict sentenced to death, the lifer and fixed - term lifer. But to the two former convicts, parole claim can be given only when they are limited to fixed - term lifer, which should be as a pre - condition. As of it, the convict should be paroled when statutory requirements emerge. In order to comply with the juristic practice, the trial period should be redesign also.
出处
《政法论丛》
2006年第4期56-60,共5页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
假释
权利
假释请求权
考验期
parole
right
claim of parole
trial period
