摘要
作者通过对社区调解以及其他恢复性司法程序与刑事司法制度的比较,认为应将恢复性司法从刑事司法制度中分离出来,成为独立制度,并最大限度地用恢复性司法解决冲突;恢复性司法应使用当事双方地位平等的民事诉讼程序模式;当恢复性司法未能解决冲突时,应使用民事诉讼而不是刑事诉讼作为后盾进而解决冲突。
Through a comparative analysis of community mediation, other restorative practices and the Dutch criminal justice system, the author argues that restorative justice should remain pure and seek maxirealization by conquering an independent institutional space upon the criminal justice system, and that restorative justice fundamentally has a civil law model of procedure in which the directly involved are equal parties. It is more logical to use the civil law as the back-up system in case of failure of the restorative process.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2006年第3期59-67,共9页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
基金
张景荪主持的2005年度司法部重点课题的阶级性研究成果。
关键词
社区调解
刑事司法
恢复性司法
法律制度的重构
community mediation
criminal justice
restorative justice
re-arranging the institutions of law
