期刊文献+

经尿道前列腺电气化术后再入院的原因探讨 被引量:15

The analysis for reason of second hospitalization after TUVP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经尿道前列腺电气化术再入院原因及处理措施。方法与结果:对4例腺体残留或复发均施行经尿道电气化术治疗,术后尿路梗阻症状解除。5例尿道狭窄,其中2例经尿道瘢痕组织冷刀切开加电切术;2例单纯行经尿道狭窄冷刀切开,1例行尿道外口切开术,定期尿道扩张后能自行排尿。6例继发性出血再入院膀胱镜检冲洗凝血块,放置三腔尿管牵扯引压迫止血。2例前列腺癌已属晚期行去势术,加用氟至尔或缓退瘤口服治疗,术后分别于2~3年因全身广泛转移导致衰竭而死亡。结论:BPH电气化术腺后腺体残留或复发,主要为腺体切除不够为再手术主要原因;尿道狭窄主要原因为电凝止血时间长、电流大、创面烧灼严重;继发性出血主要发生前列腺窝创面结痂感染脱落所致。 Objective:Approach the reason of secondary hospitalization after TUVP. Methods:review and analysis 17 patients' clinical data,the reason of secondary hospitalization after TUVP concluded.. 16 glandular remains, 5 urethral strictures, 6 secondary hemorrhages, 2 prostate cancers. Results:All of the glandular reviews or recurs have been TUVP,the symptom of urinary tract obstruction was relieved after TUVP. Among 5 urethral strictures,2 patients have been through ureter cryo-scalpel cut-off and vaporization of cicatricial tissue. 2 patients simplely been cryo-scalpel cut-off of urethral strictures, 1 patient cut-off of external urethral orifice. 6 secondary hemorrhages have been examined cystoscope and rinsed blood clot after secondary hospitalization,and put three-vent urethral catheter into the bladder to draught and oppressed for hemostasis. Owing to be advanced stage, 2 prostate cancers have been had castration operation, and applied androgen antagon, both patients died of exhaustion of all organs caused by cancer cells generally aversion. Conclusions: Review or recur of the alandular after TUVP was mainly caused by glandular been insufficiently cutted,urethral stricture was mainly caused by longly electric coagulation, large current, wound surface Severely cauterized, secondary hemorrhage was mainly caused by infected crust been ablated in prostate fossa.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2006年第10期770-771,共2页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 前列腺增生症 电气化术 hyperplasia of prostate vaporization operation secondary hospitalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1张德元,常乐政,薛兆英,郭应禄.前列腺增生症术后再入院原因分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1995,16(6):351-353. 被引量:120
  • 2张德元,中华泌尿外科杂志,1995年,6期,315页
  • 3江鱼,中华泌尿外科杂志,1980年,1期,103页
  • 4秦韶华,中华泌尿外科杂志,1980年,1期,107页
  • 5Epstein J I, Poter S R. The pathological interpretation and significance of prostate needle biopsy findings: implications and current controversies. J Urol, 2001,166:402-410.
  • 6Matlaga B R, Eskew L A, Mccullough D L,et al. Prostate biopsy: indications and technique. J Urol, 2003,169: 12-19.
  • 7Klein E A, Thompson I M. Update on chemoprevention of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol, 14: 143-149.
  • 8Laufer M,Denmeade S R, Sinibaldi V J, et al. Complete androgen blockade for prostate cancer: What went wrong? J Urol,2000,164:3~9.
  • 9Prostate Cancer Trialists'Collaborative Group. Maximun androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet ,2000,355:1491-1498.
  • 10甘为民,万恒麟,种铁,石涛.前列腺增生症手术后二次住院病案分析[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,1996,1(2):83-84. 被引量:5

共引文献61

同被引文献63

引证文献15

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部