期刊文献+

我国上市公司超能力派现的实证研究——基于公司治理结构视角 被引量:1

An empirical study on the influential factors in ultra-ability cash dividends-a perspective of corporate governance structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2000年以后随着我国派现上市公司数量增加,一些超能力派现公司格外引人关注。选取2004年深圳主板市场超能力派现的42家公司作为测试样本,建立Logistic模型,通过实证研究发现公司治理结构是上市公司发生超能力派现行为的重要影响因素,其中独立董事比例、高管薪酬水平对超能力派现具有显著性影响,公司治理结构的优化有利于制约上市公司的超能力派现行为。 As more and more Chinese listed companies grant cash dividends after 2000, it is noteworthy that some companies grant ultra-ability cash dividends. Selecting 42 listed companies which grant ultra-ability cash dividends listed in main market of Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2004 for a sampling study, the paper attempts to set up a logistic model. From the empirical research, the authors find that corporate governance structure is an important factor influencing whether listed companies grant ultra-ability cash dividends or not. Among them, the ratio of independent directors and the senior managers'compensation affect ultra-ability cash dividends markedly. Optimized corporate governance structure is beneficial to the restriction on listed companies'behavior of ultra-ability cash dividends.
出处 《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第3期28-33,共6页 Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 江苏省教育厅高等学校哲学社会科学基金项目(06SJD630033)
关键词 上市公司 治理结构 超能力派现 实证研究 corporate governance structure ultra-ability cash dividends empirical study
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献37

  • 1原红旗.[D].,1998年.
  • 2[2]Miller, Merton H. And Kevin Rock, "dividend policy under asymmetric information" [J].Journal of Finance 40, 1031-1051, 1985.
  • 3[3]Lintner, John. "distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, Retained earnings, and taxes" [J].The American Economic Review, 46, 97-113, 1956.
  • 4Borokhovich, Panino and Trapani, Outside Directors and CEO Selection.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (1996), pp. 337--355.
  • 5Hermalin, Weisbach, The Determinants of Board Composition. Rand Journal of Economics 19 (1988), pp. 589-606.
  • 6Hermalin, Weisbach, The Effects of Board Composition and Directors Incentives on Firm Performance. Financial Management, 20 (1992), pp. 101--112.
  • 7Jensen and Murphy, Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentive. Journad of Politicial Economy, 3 (1990), pp. 225--264.
  • 8Lipton, Lorsch, A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, 48. no. 1, 1992, pp. 59--77.
  • 9Wu, Yili, Honey, I Shrunk the Board, Working Paper, 2000, University of Chicago.
  • 10Yermack, Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Jounud of Financial Economis, 40(1996), pp. 185--211.

共引文献764

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部