摘要
支撑"中国威胁论"的知识论据,是来源于西方的历史实践与经验总结,它认为大国财富的增长必将产生军事影响,大国在"崛起"过程中不可避免地会以暴力方式颠覆既有的世界秩序。但传统欧洲(西方)国家体系与东亚国家体系在结构上迥然不同,前者一向大国林立而且相互竞争,后者长期以中国为中心形成封贡关系。它使欧洲和东亚世界在处理体系内部关系方面,形成了差别明显的经验传统,特别是对暴力的认知与运用上,两者有着不同的历史演进路径。这种历史经历仍然深刻影响着不同区域国家对大国"崛起"问题的感受和认识。中国文明复兴必须置于东亚国家体系的历史传统中,才能得到合适的理解与对待。
Arguments supporting the so-called concept of 'China threat' are rooted in historical practice and experiments of the West. They deem that the increase of wealth will necessarily results in the strengthening of military capacity; and in the process of the rising, a power will inevitably challenge established world order by means of violence. However, there is a fundamental difference between traditional European state system and that of East Asian's in terms of structure. The former was characterized by fierce competition among powers, while the latter had a long history of tribute paying with China as a centre. Owing to this, the two continents formed their own distinctive tradition of tackling relations within the system respectively, especially on the cognition and use of violence. The historical evolutions of the two are quite different, and up-to-date, still have deep influences on the ideas of 'rising of a power' in different regions in the world. The revival of Chinese civilization could only be properly understood and dealt with by regarding it in the historical tradition of East Asia system.
出处
《欧洲研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期3-19,共17页
Chinese Journal of European Studies
