期刊文献+

国际关系研究与诠释学方法 被引量:10

International Relations Studies and the Method of Hermeneutics
原文传递
导出
摘要 国际关系研究离不开对文本的研究。研究文本,最基本的途径之一就是运用诠释学方法理解其意义并做出适当的解释。作为一种解释文本的技艺学,诠释学在国际关系研究中应该成为一种得到认可的方法。在中国的国际关系学界,尽管多数研究者的路径属于这种方法,但通常并没有明确的方法论意识。从研究旨趣来说,进行意义的诠释不是要提出解释客观规律的理论,也不是要提出假设进行论证与验证,而是要得出更好的理解与解释。由于在实际操作中这种方法的运用比较随意,缺乏严谨的路径和步骤,因此容易造成难以创新和低水平重复的情况。从学科建设的角度来说,这种情况必须改变。由于国际关系研究不能没有理解与解释,因此对诠释方法的完善是必要的,也是必然的和可能的。 With respect to international relations studies, it is necessary to deal with texts. To study texts, one of the most basic approaches is to understand their meaning and make proper interpretations by hermeneutics. As an art of interpretation of texts, hermeneutics should become a recognized method in IR research. Although most researchers in China adopt this approach in their IR studies, they are not very conscious of this methodology. The purpose of hermeneutics is neither to put forward theories to explain objective rules nor to set up a hypothesis to be proves and tested, but to draw much better understandings and interpretations. However, due to rather easy application in practical operations and the lack of a rigorous scientific method and process, this approach is very unlikely to be adopted and instead it is merely repeated at a low level. Nevertheless, with regard to the construction of the discipline, such a situation must change. Since IR research cannot develop without understanding and interpretation, it is both imperative and possible that a hermeneutic approach be perfected.
作者 李少军
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第10期7-13,共7页 World Economics and Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Martin Hollis and Steve Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 1990, pp. 1-7,pp. 45-91 ,pp. 196-216.
  • 2[美]詹姆斯·多尔蒂 小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫 阎学通 陈寒溪等.《争论中的国际关系理论》(第五版)[M].世界知识出版社,2003年版.第70,7页.
  • 3[德]弗里德里希·阿斯特著.《诠释学》的节选.洪汉鼎主编.《理解与解释—诠释学经典文选》,第14页.
  • 4[德]汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔著,洪汉鼎译.《真理与方法》(上卷),上海:上海译文出版社,2004年版,第383页.
  • 5David E. McNabb, Research Methods for Political Science, Arrnonk,New York and London : M. E. Sharpe, 2004, p.344,p.351,p341,p342,p343,pp345-346.
  • 6[美]肯尼思·华尔兹著 信强译.《国际政治理论》[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003年版..
  • 7Thomas A. Schwandt, Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms,Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997, p.73.
  • 8Judy Pearsall, ed. , The New Oxford Dictionary of English, Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1998, p. 858.
  • 9Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, Springfield, MA.: Merriam- Webster Inc. , Publisher, 1987,p. 566.
  • 10John W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

共引文献39

引证文献10

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部