摘要
源于崔述和受诸胡适的顾颉刚层累造成说的主要精神是,存疑的态度和追溯并展示源流的做法;梁启超历史研究法和陈垣史源学中先提出疑问,然后考察史料源流的方法,与朗格诺瓦、瑟诺博司在《史学原论》中所表述的如出一辙;福柯的史学方法是以解构历史观念为特征的,然而其“知识考古学”和“谱系学”正体现了怀疑精神和对话语的历史演变的梳理。可见,无论处在传统社会还是近代社会,也无论是在中国还是西方,思想家或者历史学家们的学术追求,在主张以怀疑的态度去条缕历代关于同质材料的不同诠释这一点上并无二致,尽管他们使用了表面上具有很大差异的专业术语。
Gu Jiegang＇s “Ceng Lei Zao Cheng Shuo” is partly from Cui Shu and Hu Shi＇s ideas. The essential spirit is doubting attitude, and tracing and displaying the origin and spread. The doubting, then investigating the origin and spread of historical material, which is in Liang Qichao＇s historical study and Chen Yuan＇s “View on Historical Origin”, is same as what V. Langnois and Seignobos said in Introduction aux Etudes Historiques. Foucault＇s historical method is deconstruction of ideas in history. His “Archeology of Knowledge” and “Genealogy” just reflect doubting spirit and display the historical evolution of discourse. So whether in traditional society or modern society, whether in China or the West, the thinkers or historians have the same proposition, that is, to display the different interpretations on the same material, though they may use very different professional terminology.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第10期92-95,103,共5页
Journal of Historical Science
关键词
历史学
不同话语体系
怀疑精神
历史演进
historiography
different system of discourse
doubting spirit
historical evolution
