期刊文献+

不接触、不冲洗、不引流操作对阑尾切除术后并发症的影响 被引量:2

Significance of no contacting, no washing and no draining to reduce the complications of appendectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨阑尾切除术中采用不接触、不冲洗、不引流操作(“三不操作”)对阑尾切除术后并发症的影响。方法将急性化脓性阑尾炎232例患者随机分为两组,即采用“三不操作”组(A组)和“非三不操作”组(B组),每组116例。阑尾切除术中采用的“三不操作”为(1)不接触避免切口直接或间接地接触阑尾或脓液。(2)不冲洗不管阑尾是否穿孔、脓液多少均不冲洗腹腔而采用纱布将腹腔脓液重点有序地蘸除。(3)不引流在彻底清除腹腔脓液后不放置引流管。结果随访3年,A组切口感染4例,腹腔脓肿2例,腹壁炎性包块1例,粘连性肠梗阻3例。B组切口感染13例,腹腔脓肿9例,腹壁炎性包块7例,粘连性肠梗阻12例。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论阑尾切除术中采用“三不操作”可有效降低切口感染、腹腔脓肿、腹壁炎性包块及粘连性肠梗阻的发生率,值得提倡。 Objective To study the significance of no contacting,no washing and no draining ( "3 no operation" ) namely on the complications of appendectomy. Methods Two hundred and thirty - two cases of acute suppurative appendicitis were divided into two groups randomly. Group A adopted " 3 no operation", while group B did not. No contacting: to prevent the appendix and pus of abdominal cavity from the wound directly or indirectly. No washing: the pus was eliminated orderly by gauzes without the abdominal cavity washing. No draining: no drainage tube was used in any cases. All cases were fol- lowed up for 3 years. Results Group A or B had 4 or 13 cases of incision infection, 2 or 9 cases of abdominal cavity abscess, 1 or 7 cases of abdominal wall inflammatory mass, 3 or 12 cases of adhesive intestinal ileus respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions "3 no operation" in appendectomy could effectively reduce the complications such as wound infection and adhesive intestinal ileus and so on.
出处 《中国医师进修杂志(外科版)》 2006年第10期28-29,32,共3页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 阑尾炎 化脓性 阑尾切除术 并发症 Appendicitis,suppurative Appendectomy Complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1吴昆生,戴诗梅,宝福凯,富冬,沈丽宁.急性阑尾炎的细菌学研究及药敏试验[J].实用外科杂志,1989,9(12):645-646. 被引量:29
  • 2Muller SA, Treutner KH, Tietze L, et al. Influence of early drainage of intraperitoneal phospholipids on efficacy of adhesion prevention. J Invest Surg, 2002, 15(1): 23-28.
  • 3Memon MA, Memon MI, Donohue JH. Abdominal drains a brief historical review. Ir Med J, 2001, 94(6): 164-166.
  • 4Memon MA, Memon B, Memon MI, et al. The uses and abuses of drains in abdominal surgery. Hosp Med, 2002, 63 (5) : 282-288.
  • 5Baker EA, Gaddal SE, Aitken DG, et al. Growth factor profiles in intraperitoneal drainage fluid following colorectal surgery: relationship to wound healing and surgery. Wound Repair Regen,2003,11(4): 261-267.
  • 6Khurrrum Baig M, Hua Zhao R, Batista O, et al. Percutaneous postoperative intra-abdominal abscess drainage after elective colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol,2002, 6(3) : 159-164.
  • 7Men S, Akhan O, Koroglu M. Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abcess. Eur J Radiol,2002, 43(3) : 204-218.
  • 8Rose SC, Roberts AC, Kinney TB, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasongraphy for planning percutaneous drainage of complex abdominal fluid collections. J Vasc Interv Radiol,2003, 14(4) : 451-459.
  • 9Kjossev KT, Losanoff JE. Complication of prophylactic intraperitoneal drainage. Dig Dis Sci,2001, 46(11):. 2456.
  • 10姜洪池,孙备.正确应用外科引流[J].临床外科杂志,2000,8(6):325-326. 被引量:21

共引文献96

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部