摘要
目的:分析男性吸毒劳教人员的人格特征和人格类型。方法:①于2003-01/2005-12选择江西省强制劳教所因吸毒而被劳教的男性吸毒人员756名。均看得懂文字说明,且配合问卷调查。②采用全国协作组修订的卡特尔16种人格因素测试量表进行人格特征评估。该量表由187个题目组成,包括16个维度乐群性、聪慧性、稳定性、恃强性、兴奋性、有恒性、敢为性、敏感性、怀疑性、幻想性、世故性、忧虑性、实验性、独立性、自律性、紧张性。每一测试题各有a,b,c3个答案,根据被试对每一测题的回答,分别对a,b,c记为0,1,2或2,1,0分。每一因素的各题所得的分数总和即为每一因素的原始分数,换算出标准分。高分代表被试在某因素上表现出高分特征,低分同理。不计总分。采取以一个中队为单位集体统一问卷,统一指导语。采用无记名填写答卷。男性成人常模源于《卡氏十六种人格因素量表手册》。女性吸毒劳教人员评分结果来源于作者即往研究。③计量资料间差异比较采用t检验,选用最远邻法,以欧氏距离为测度距离的方法对样本进行聚类。结果:收回填写完整、真实的问卷669份。①男性吸毒劳教人员与男性成人常模卡特尔16种人格因素测试量表评分结果比较:男性吸毒人员卡特尔16种人格因素测试量表的维度乐群性、恃强性、兴奋性、敢为性、世故性、忧虑性和紧张性因子得分分别为(6.37±1.21),(6.58±1.39),(6.74±1.55),(6.43±1.35),(6.57±1.51),(6.31±1.55),(6.29±1.27)分,明显高于男性成人常模[(5.50±1.42)分,t=13.521～20.799,P<0.01];聪慧性、稳定性、有恒性、敏感性、幻想性、独立性、自律性得分分别为(4.26±2.20),(5.14±1.48),(4.43±1.58),(4.84±1.50),(4.94±1.46),(4.42±1.62),(4.65±1.38)分,明显低于男性成人常模(t=-6.273～-17.389,P<0.01);实验性和怀疑性得分与男性成人常模相近,分别为(5.59±1.52),(5.62±1.59)分(P>0.05)。②男性吸毒劳教人员与女性吸毒劳教人员的人格特点比较结果:男性吸毒人员稳定性、恃强性、兴奋性、敢为性、世故性、实验性和紧张性得分分别为(5.14±1.48),(6.58±1.39),(6.74±1.55),(6.43±1.35),(6.57±1.51),(5.59±1.52),(6.29±1.27)分,明显高于女性[(4.46±1.65),(4.54±1.61),(5.61±1.81),(5.16±1.45),(5.26±1.62),(5.10±1.42),(5.10±1.16)分,t=3.836～16.057,P<0.01],乐群性、敏感性、幻想性、忧虑性、独立性和自律性得分分别为(6.37±1.21),(4.84±1.50),(4.94±1.46),(6.31±1.55),(4.42±1.62),(4.65±1.38)分,明显低于女性[(6.69±1.55),(6.87±1.55),(5.78±1.42),(7.29±1.77),(5.22±1.56),(5.20±1.15)分,t=-2.829～-14.843,P<0.01]。③人格类型聚类分析结果:669名吸毒人员中兴奋型占13.6%、世故型占14.0%、忧郁型占9.0%、依赖型占19.3%、不安全型占13.0%和幼稚型占31.1%。结论:①男性吸毒人员有特殊的人格特征,与女性人格特征有明显差异。②男性吸毒人员可以分为6种不同的人格类型。
AIM： To analyze the personality characteristics and styles of male drug abuser in labor camp.
METHODS： ① 756 male drug abusers in Jiangxi Provincial Forced Labor Camp between January 2003 and December 2005 were selected. All subjects were literate and cooperated with the questionnaire investigation. ② 16PF revised by national cooperating group was adopted to evaluate the personality characteristics, which was composed of 187 items, including 16 dimensions： Sociability, Intelligence, Stability, Conceitedness, Courageousness, Excitability, Conscientiousness, Knowingness, Anxiety, Tension, Sensitivity, Fancy, Experimentation, Independence and Self- discipline. There were 3 answers for each question, which was scored at 0, 1, 3 points or 2, 1, 0 points respectively. The sum of score in each question was the raw-score of each factor, and the standard score could be calculated. High score represented high characteristic in some factor, and it was the same in low score. The total score was not recorded. Unified collective questionnaire and unified instructions were adopted in each group, and subjects filled in the questionnaires namelessly. Male adult norm were obtained from 16PF. The scores of female drug abusers were obtained from previous research. ③ Differences in measurement data were compared with t test, and furthest neighbor method was used to clustering the samples by taking Euclidean distance as the measurement distance.
RESULTS： A total of 669 complete and true questionnaires were recollected. ①Comparison in 16PF score between male drug abusers and adult male norm： The scores of Sociability, Conceitedness, Excitability, Courageousness, Knowing, Anxiety and Tension in male drug abusers were （6.37±1.21）, （6.58±1.39）, （6.74±1.55）, （6.43±1.35）, （6.57±1.51）, （6.31 ±1.55）, （6.29±1.27） points respectively, which were obviously higher than those of adult male norm [（5.50±1.42） points, t=13.521-20.799, P 〈 0.01]. The scores of Intelligent, Stability, Conscientiousness, Sensitivity, Fancy, Independence and Self-discipline were respectively （4.26±2.20）, （5.14±1.48）, （4.43±1.58）, （4.84±1.50）, （4.94±1.46）, （4.42±1.62）, （4.65±1.38） points, which were remarkably lower than those of male adult norm （t =-6.273 -17.389, P 〈 0.01）, while their scores of experimentation and suspicion were similar to those of male adult norm, which were respectively （5.59 ±1.52）, （5.62±1.59） points （P 〉 0.05）. ②Comparison in personality characteristics between male drug abuser and female abuser： the scores of Stability, Conscientiousness, Courageousness, Excitability, Knowing, Experimentation and Tension were （5.14±1.48）,（6.58±1.39）,（6.74±1.55）,（6.43±1.35）,（6.57±1.51）,（5.59±1.52）,（6.29±1.27） points respectively, which were markedly higher than those of female drug abusers [（4.46±1.65）, （4.54±1.61）, （5.61±1.81）, （5.16±1.45）, （5.26±1.62）, （5.10±1.42）, （5.10 ±1.16） points, t=3.836-16.057,P〈 0.01], and the scores of Sociability, Sensitivity, Fancy, Anxiety, Independence and Self-discipline were （6.3±1.21）, （4.84±1.50）, （4.94±1.46）, （6.31±1.55）, （4.42±1.62）, （4.65±1.38） points respectively, which were obviously lower than those of female drug abusers （6.69±1.55）, （6.87±1.55）, （5.78±1.42）, （7.29±1.77）, （5.22±1.56）, （5.20±1.15） points, t=-2.829-14.843, P 〈 0.01]. ③ Analytical results of personality style clustering： Excitability accounted for 13,6% in 669 subjects, Knowingness accounted for 14.0%, Depression accounted for 9.0%, Dependence accounted for 19.3%, Insecurity accounted for 13.0% and Infantility accounted for 31.1%.
CONCLUSION： ① Male drug abusers have special personality characteristics, which are significantly different from those of female drug abusers. ② Male drug abusers can be divided into 6 typical personality styles.
出处
《中国临床康复》
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第42期43-46,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
基金
江西省高校人文社科研究项目(03XL03)~~
