期刊文献+

关于完善现行《医疗事故分级标准(试行)》的设想 被引量:4

Consideration on Amending Standards of Medical Malpractice Classification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《医疗事故分级标准(试行)》使用过程中遇到的主要问题有:对判定器官损害程度的基准未予说明,例举情形相对不足,例举条目中存在有失均衡、文字错误、有悖《医疗事故处理条例》精神及难以把握的情况。通过对问题的分析,提出现行标准需要进一步完善,并对修改方式进行了探讨,为今后标准的修改、完善提供参考。 Problems occur during the application of Standards of Medical Malpractice Classification including a lack of explanation about the standards to scale damnific degree of organ function and insufficient examples. Among the limited examples that are listed in the Standards, some are disproportionate, some have typos errors and some are against the principles of The Regulation on the Medical Treatment Incidents, all these have made the Standards difficult to comprehend and follow. By analyzing issues above, we suggest that the Standards needs to be modified and several methods of amendment are discussed. We hope they could be of some reference for further improvement of the Standards.
出处 《中国医院管理》 北大核心 2006年第11期21-23,共3页 Chinese Hospital Management
关键词 医疗事故 伤残评定 标准 medical malpractice, gradation of disability, standards
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1仇永贵.医疗事故损害赔偿不适用《人身损害赔偿司法解释》[J].中华医院管理杂志,2004,20(12):737-738. 被引量:5
  • 2中华人民共和国卫生部令第32号.医疗事故分级标准(试行).[S].中华人民共和国卫生部,..
  • 3Harding GF,Odom JV,Spileers W,Spekreijse H.Standard for visual evoked potentials 1995.The international society for clinical electrophysiology of vision [J].Vision Res 1996;36(21):3567-3572.
  • 4Marmor MF,Zrenner E.Standard for clinical electroretinography[J].Doc Ophthalmol 1998;97:143-156.
  • 5Hood DC.Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique[J].Prog Retin Eye Res 2000;19(5):607-646.
  • 6.最高人民法院法释[2001]33号文:最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定[Z].,2001—12-6..
  • 7.中华人民共和国民法通则[Z].,1986-04-12..
  • 8.医疗事故处理条例[Z].,2002-04-04..
  • 9.最高人民法院法[2003]20号文:关于参照《医疗事故处理条例》审理医疗纠纷民事案件通知[Z].,2003—1-6..
  • 10张丽珠.临床生殖内分泌与不育症[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.166.

共引文献32

同被引文献18

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部